Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19348740›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2009

Reaction fields in the environment of fluorescent probes: polarity profiles in membranes.

Derek Marsh

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Derek MarshMax-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Abteilung Spektroskopie, Göttingen, Germany. dmarsh@gwdg.de
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescent probes in biological systems are sensitive to environmental polarity by virtue of their response to the reaction field created by polarization of the dielectric medium. Classically, fluorophore solvatochromism is analyzed in terms of the Lippert equation and later variants, all of which rely upon the original reaction field of Onsager. A recent survey of the solvent dependence of EPR spin-label probes, which are responsive solely to the reaction field in the ground state without the complication of excited states, shows that the reaction field of Block and Walker performs best in describing the polarity dependence. In this model, the step-function transition to the bulk dielectric medium used by Onsager is replaced by a graded transition. Analysis of the Stokes shifts for representative fluorescent membrane probes, such as PRODAN, DANSYL, and anthroyl fatty acid, reveals that, of several different reaction fields (including that of Onsager), the Block-Walker model best describes the dependence on solvent dielectric constant and refractive index for the different probes simultaneously. This is after full allowance is made for all contributions involving polarizability of the fluorophore, a point that is frequently neglected or treated incorrectly in studies using biological fluorescent probes. By using the full range of polar and apolar solvents, it is then possible to establish a common reference for the polarity dependence of different fluorophores and to relate this also to the polarity dependence of biologically relevant spin-label EPR probes. An important application is calibration of the transmembrane polarity profile recorded by fluorescent probes in terms of the high-resolution profile obtained from site-specifically spin-labeled lipid chains.

Indexed as

AbsorptionBiophysical PhenomenaCalibrationCell MembraneElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyFluorescent DyesModels, ChemicalSolventsSpectrometry, FluorescenceSpin LabelsFluorescent DyesSolventsSpin Labels

Identifiers

PMID19348740
PMCPMC2711299
OpenAlexW1998132712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.