Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19348685›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2009

Scoring and psychometric validation of the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q).

M H Prins, I Guillemin, H Gilet, S Gabriel, B Essers, G Raskob, S R Kahn

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00062803 phase3completednot on this map

The Van Gogh-PE Trial, a Multicenter, International, Randomized, Open-Label, Assessor-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Subcutaneous SR34006 With the Combination of (LMW)Heparin and Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in the Treatment of Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2003 to 2005ConditionsPulmonary EmbolismArmsSR34006, (LMW)heparin, Warfarin VKA, Acenocoumarol VKA
NCT00067093 phase3completednot on this map

Safety and Efficacy Trial Evaluating the Use of SR34006 in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2003 to 2005Enrolled1,452ConditionsDeep Vein ThrombosisArmsSanOrg34006, LMW heparin, Unfractionated heparin, Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)
NCT00070655 phase3completednot on this map

The AMADEUS Trial, A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Assessor Blind, Non-inferiority Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once-weekly Subcutaneous Idraparinux (SR34006) With Adjusted-dose Oral Vitamin-K Antagonists in the Prevention of Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2003 to 2006Enrolled4,673ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsSR34006 (idraparinux sodium) Injection, vitamin K antagonist (warfarin or acenocoumarol) tablets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Edoxaban therapy increases treatment satisfaction and reduces utilization of healthcare resources: an analysis from the EdoxabaN vs. warfarin in subjectS UndeRgoing cardiovErsion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF) study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Comparison of quality of life measurements: EQ-5D-5L versus disease/treatment-specific measures in pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

M H PrinsThe Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institutes, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Mh.Prins@EPID.unimaas.nl
I Guillemin
H Gilet
S Gabriel
B Essers
G Raskob
S R Kahn
Mapi Research Trust · FRMaastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMcGill University · CASanofi (France) · FRUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 'Perception of Anti-Coagulant Treatment Questionnaire' (PACT-Q) was developed to assess patients' expectations of, and satisfaction with their anticoagulant treatment. This questionnaire needs to be finalised and psychometrically validated.

methodsThe PACT-Q was included in the United States, The Netherlands and France into three phase III multinational clinical trials conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of a new long-acting anticoagulant drug (idraparinux) compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA). PACT-Q was administered to patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), atrial fibrillation (AF) or pulmonary embolism (PE) at Day 1, to assess patients' expectations, and at 3 and 6 months to assess patients' satisfaction and treatment convenience and burden. The final structure of the PACT-Q (Principal Component Analysis--PCA--with Varimax Rotation) was first determined and its psychometric properties were then measured with validity of the structure (Multitrait analysis), internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficients) and known-group validity.

resultsPCA and multitrait analyses showed the multidimensionality of the "Treatment Expectations" dimension, comprising 7 items that had to be scored independently. The "Convenience" and "Burden of Disease and Treatment" dimensions of the hypothesised original structure of the questionnaire were combined, thus resulting in 13 items grouped into the single dimension "Convenience". The "Anticoagulant Treatment Satisfaction" dimension remained unchanged and included 7 items. All items of the "Convenience" and "Anticoagulant Treatment Satisfaction" dimensions displayed good convergent and discriminant validity. The internal consistency reliability was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 for the "Convenience" dimension, and 0.76 for the "Anticoagulant Treatment Satisfaction" dimension. Known-group validity was good, especially with regard to occurrence of thromboembolic events within 3 months from randomisation.

conclusionThe PACT-Q is a valid and reliable instrument that allows the assessment of patients' expectations and satisfaction regarding anticoagulant treatment, as well as their opinion about treatment convenience of use. Its two-part structure--assessment of expectations at baseline in the first part, and of convenience, burden and treatment satisfaction in the second--was validated and displays good and stable psychometric properties. These results are not sufficient to recommend the use of satisfaction as primary endpoint in clinical trials; further validation work is needed to support the interpretation of PACT-Q dimension scores. However, this first validation makes the PACT-Q an appropriate measure for use in clinical and pharmacoepidemiological research, as well as in real-life studies.

trial registration(ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00067093, NCT00062803 and NCT00070655).

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPsychometricsAgedAnticoagulantsFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID19348685
PMCPMC2686675
OpenAlexW2136441142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.