ReviewJournal of radiation research2009
Consequences of cytoplasmic irradiation: studies from microbeam.
Review in Journal of radiation research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resolving the contradiction between simulation and experimental results of using gold nanoparticles in proton therapy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of cell geometry, cellular uptake region, and tumour morphology onEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- AdipoRon Alleviates Liver Injury by Protecting Hepatocytes from Mitochondrial Damage Caused by Ionizing Radiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Radiopharmaceuticals for Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Current Approaches and Future Directions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Analysis of boron neutron capture reaction sensitivity using Monte Carlo simulation and proposal of a new dosimetry index in boron neutron capture therapy.Journal of radiation research · 2022Article
- Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect and Cytoplasmic Irradiation Studies with Microbeams.Biology · 2022Review
- Mitochondrial DNA damage as driver of cellular outcomes.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022Review
- Ion Transport and Radioresistance.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2022Review
- Radiation-Induced Lipid Peroxidation Triggers Ferroptosis and Synergizes with Ferroptosis Inducers.ACS chemical biology · 2020Article
- Rationale for Combining Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Patients With Hypoxic Tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2018Review
- α-Emitters for Radiotherapy: From Basic Radiochemistry to Clinical Studies-Part 1.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018Review
- Live cell imaging of mitochondria following targeted irradiation in situ reveals rapid and highly localized loss of membrane potential.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Effect of gadolinium-based nanoparticles on nuclear DNA damage and repair in glioblastoma tumor cells.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2016Article
- Mitochondrial stress controls the radiosensitivity of the oxygen effect: Implications for radiotherapy.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Microirradiation techniques in radiobiological research.Journal of biosciences · 2015Review
- Crosstalk between telomere maintenance and radiation effects: A key player in the process of radiation-induced carcinogenesis.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research · 2014Review
- Article
- Radiation induced bystander effects in mice given low doses of radiation in vivo.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The prevailing dogma for radiation biology is that genotoxic effects of ionizing radiation such as mutations and carcinogenesis are attributed mainly to direct damage to the nucleus. However, with the development of microbeam that can target precise positions inside the cells, accumulating evidences have shown that energy deposit by radiation in nuclear DNA is not required to trigger the damage, extra-nuclear or extra-cellular radiation could induce the similar biological effects as well. This review will summarize the biological responses after cytoplasm irradiated by microbeam, and the possible mechanisms involved in cytoplasmic irradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.