Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19345957›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2009

Trait impulsivity and response inhibition in antisocial personality disorder.

Alan C Swann, Marijn Lijffijt, Scott D Lane, Joel L Steinberg, F Gerard Moeller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Neural Correlates of Trait Impulsivity among Adult Healthy Individuals.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alan C SwannDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, 1300 Moursund Street, Room 270, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Alan.C.Swann@uth.tmc.edu
Marijn Lijffijt
Scott D Lane
Joel L Steinberg
F Gerard Moeller

Funding

U OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1RR024148 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2006 to 2010
$27.9M
Norepinephrine and ImpulsivityR01MH069944 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SWANN, ALAN C · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
SEROTONIN, IMPULSIVITY AND COCAINE DEPENDENCE TREATMENTR01DA008425 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 1996 to 2004
$1.4M
Serotonin, Impulsivity, and Substance AbuseK02DA000403 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2000 to 2011
$1.2M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024148NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR024148NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA000403NIDA NIH HHS KO2-DA00403NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA008425NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA08425NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069944NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH69944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpulsive behavior is a prominent characteristic of antisocial personality disorder. Impulsivity is a complex construct, however, representing distinct domains of cognition and action. Leading models refer to impulsivity as an inability to evaluate a stimulus fully before responding to it (rapid-response impulsivity), and as an inability to delay responding despite a larger reward (reward-delay impulsivity). We investigated these models in terms of the diagnosis and severity of antisocial personality disorder.

methodsThirty-four male subjects on probation/parole who met DSM-IV criteria for ASPD, and 30 male healthy comparison subjects, matched by ethnicity, were recruited from the community. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) provided an integrated measure of trait impulsivity. Rapid-response impulsivity was assessed using the Immediate Memory Task (IMT), a continuous performance test. Reward delay impulsivity was assessed using the Two-choice Impulsivity Paradigm (TCIP), where subjects had the choice of smaller-sooner or larger-delayed rewards, and the Single Key Impulsivity Paradigm (SKIP), a free-operant responding task.

resultsCompared to controls, subjects with ASPD had higher BIS-11 scores (Effect Size (E.S.)=0.95). They had slower reaction times to IMT commission errors (E.S.=0.45). Correct detections, a measure of attention, were identical to controls. On the SKIP, they had a shorter maximum delay for reward (E.S.=0.76), but this was not significant after correction for age and education. The groups did not differ on impulsive choices on the TCIP (E.S.<0.1). On probit analysis with age and education as additional independent variables, BIS-11 score, IMT reaction time to a commission error, and IMT positive response bias contributed significantly to diagnosis of ASPD; SKIP delay for reward did not. Severity of ASPD, assessed by the number of ASPD symptoms endorsed on the SCID-II, correlated significantly with commission errors (impulsive responses) on the IMT, and with liberal IMT response bias. This relationship persisted with correction for age and education. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that ASPD is characterized by increased rapid-response impulsivity. Aspects of impulsivity related to reward-delay or attention appear relatively intact.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultAntisocial Personality DisorderDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPersonality AssessmentPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID19345957
PMCPMC2716408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.