Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19344557›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2009

Improving the provision of carotid endarterectomy in line with UK Government targets requires more than just motivated surgeons.

Claire Brown, A Ross Naylor

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. RACE to protect brains.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire BrownDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
A Ross Naylor

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCarotid endarterectomy confers maximum benefit in symptomatic patients provided it is performed within < 2 weeks of presentation, but few centres achieve this target. The objective of this study was to determine if a surgeon with an interest in carotid endarterectomy could make simple modifications to practice so that carotid endarterectomy was performed within 2 weeks of referral in the majority of patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsAudit of 44 symptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy by one surgeon in 2007 after implementing simple changes in practice (e.g. ad hoc cancellation of non-urgent cases, ad hoc utilisation of cancelled theatre sessions). Outcomes were compared with 36 symptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in 2006.

resultsThere was only a modest reduction in delay to surgery. In 2006, 11% underwent carotid endarterectomy within 2 weeks of referral increasing to 20% in 2007. By 2007, 48% underwent surgery within 4 weeks compared with 33% in 2006.

conclusionsNotwithstanding the additional impact of delays from symptom onset to referral, achieving a 2-week target will require more than motivated surgeons making simple changes to practice. It seems inevitable that vascular units will have to identify 1-2 'ring fenced' theatre sessions per week (but some could go unused) and surgeons will have to accept that they may not always operate on the patients they work-up.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareEndarterectomy, CarotidEnglandHealth PolicyHumansIschemic Attack, TransientMedical AuditReferral and ConsultationStrokeWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID19344557
PMCPMC2749404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.