ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2009
Improving the provision of carotid endarterectomy in line with UK Government targets requires more than just motivated surgeons.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A strategy to meet the 'two-week' target for carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2011Article
- RACE to protect brains.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCarotid endarterectomy confers maximum benefit in symptomatic patients provided it is performed within < 2 weeks of presentation, but few centres achieve this target. The objective of this study was to determine if a surgeon with an interest in carotid endarterectomy could make simple modifications to practice so that carotid endarterectomy was performed within 2 weeks of referral in the majority of patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsAudit of 44 symptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy by one surgeon in 2007 after implementing simple changes in practice (e.g. ad hoc cancellation of non-urgent cases, ad hoc utilisation of cancelled theatre sessions). Outcomes were compared with 36 symptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in 2006.
resultsThere was only a modest reduction in delay to surgery. In 2006, 11% underwent carotid endarterectomy within 2 weeks of referral increasing to 20% in 2007. By 2007, 48% underwent surgery within 4 weeks compared with 33% in 2006.
conclusionsNotwithstanding the additional impact of delays from symptom onset to referral, achieving a 2-week target will require more than motivated surgeons making simple changes to practice. It seems inevitable that vascular units will have to identify 1-2 'ring fenced' theatre sessions per week (but some could go unused) and surgeons will have to accept that they may not always operate on the patients they work-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.