Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19343510›Full record

ReviewGenetica2009

The NemaGENETAG initiative: large scale transposon insertion gene-tagging in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Daphne Bazopoulou, Nektarios Tavernarakis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genetica, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. TheGenetics · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Targeted genome engineering inCell & bioscience · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Forward and reverse mutagenesis in C. elegans.WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology · 2014
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Metal-induced neurodegeneration in C. elegans.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Selectable genetic markers for nematode transgenesis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reverse genetics in eukaryotes.Biology of the cell · 2010
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daphne BazopoulouInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, 70013, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Nektarios Tavernarakis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is a widely appreciated, powerful platform in which to study important biological mechanisms related to human health. More than 65% of human disease genes have homologues in the C. elegans genome, and essential aspects of mammalian cell biology, neurobiology and development are faithfully recapitulated in this organism. The EU-funded NemaGENETAG project was initiated with the aim to develop cutting-edge tools and resources that will facilitate modelling of human pathologies in C. elegans, and advance our understanding of animal development and physiology. The main objective of the project involves the generation and evaluation of a large collection of transposon-tagged mutants. In the process of achieving this objective the NemaGENETAG consortium also endeavours to optimize and automate existing transposon-mediated mutagenesis methodologies based on the Mos1 transposable element, in addition to developing alternatives using other transposon systems. The final product of this initiative-a comprehensive collection of transposon-tagged alleles-together with the acquisition of efficient transposon-based tools for mutagenesis and transgenesis in C. elegans, should yield a wealth of information on gene function, immediately relevant to key biological processes and to pharmaceutical research and development.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDNA Transposable ElementsGene Transfer TechniquesGenomicsHumansMutagenesis, InsertionalMutant ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsMutant Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.