Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19343437›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2009

Long-term results of hiatal hernia mesh repair and antireflux laparoscopic surgery.

E Soricelli, N Basso, A Genco, M Cipriano

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Short- and long-term results of laparoscopic versus open anti-reflux surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Postoperative quality of life after minimally invasive repair of giant hiatal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. 3D mesh-augmented hiatal hernia repair in patients with GERD: A 3-year single-center experience.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hiatal hernia repair: prevention of mesh erosion and migration into the esophagogastric junction.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2020
    Article
  11. Mesh erosion after hiatal hernia repair: the tip of the iceberg?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Hiatus hernia : Standards and controversies in diagnostics and treatment].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long-term results and complications related to CrurasoftHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2017
    Article
  19. [Operative treatment of hiatus hernia : Evidence on mesh inlay].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E SoricelliLa Sapienza University, Paride Stefanini, Rome, Italy.
N Basso
A Genco
M Cipriano
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) represents the gold standard in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without hiatal hernia. It offers excellent long-term results and high patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, several studies have reported a high rate of intrathoracic wrap migration or paraesophageal hernia recurrence. To reduce the incidence of this complication, the use of prosthetic meshes has been advocated. This study retrospectively evaluated the long-term results of LARS with or without the use of a mesh in a series of patients treated from 1992 to 2007.

methodsFrom November 1992 to May 2007, 297 patients underwent laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the authors' department. Crural closure was performed by means of two or three interrupted nonabsorbable sutures for 93 patients (group A), by tailored 3 x 4-cm polypropylene mesh placement for 113 patients (group B), and by nonabsorbable suture plus superimposed tailored mesh for 91 patients (group C).

resultsThe mean follow-up period for the entire group was 95.1 +/- 38.7 months, specifically 95.2 +/- 49 months for group A, 117.6 +/- 18 months for group B, and 69.3 +/-.17.6 months for group C. Intrathoracic Nissen wrap migration or hiatal hernia recurrence occurred for nine patients (9.6%) in group A, two patients (1.8%) in group B, and only one patient (1.1%) in group C. Esophageal erosion occurred in only one case (0.49%). Functional results and the long-term quality-of-life evaluation after surgery showed a significant and durable improvement with no significant differences related to the type of hiatoplasty.

conclusionOver a long-term follow-up period, the use of a prosthetic polypropylene mesh in the crura for hiatal hernia proved to be effective in reducing the rate of postoperative intrathoracic wrap migration or hernia recurrence, with a very low incidence of mesh-related complications.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurgical MeshAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFundoplicationGastroesophageal RefluxHernia, HiatalHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProbability

Identifiers

PMID19343437
OpenAlexW2067314556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.