ReviewTargeted oncology2009
Targeted therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Review in Targeted oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological agents: what they are, how they affect oral health and how they can modulate oral healthcare.British dental journal · 2015Review
- Role of CD20 monoclonal antibodies in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2010Review
- Engaging the lysosomal compartment to combat B cell malignancies.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The introduction of targeted agents such as the monoclonal antibodies rituximab (anti-CD20) and alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) has brought about a remarkable change in the therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although it is unclear whether overall survival has been improved, the incorporation of these monoclonal antibodies into chemoimmunotherapy regimens has dramatically improved complete response rates and progression-free survival in patients with both newly-diagnosed and relapsed CLL. The success of rituximab and alemtuzumab has spurred the development of other monoclonal antibodies targeting distinct proteins and epitopes on the surface of CLL cells and an exciting array of novel immunotherapeutics. The judicious use of these agents provides the opportunity to develop risk-adapted therapeutic strategies to optimize responses and quality of life in patients with CLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19343298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.