Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19343272›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2009

The efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly alendronate 70 mg on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis.

Yuxiang Yan, Wei Wang, Hanmin Zhu, Mei Li, Jianli Liu, Bangyao Luo, Haibao Xie, Guangjian Zhang, Fuobao Li

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Alendronate sodium/vitamin D3 combination tablet versus calcitriol for osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: a 6-month, randomized, open-label, active-comparator-controlled study with a 6-month extension.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Pharmacological Therapies for Osteoporosis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Treatment of Osteoporosis, with a Focus on 2 Monoclonal Antibodies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuxiang YanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Capital Medical University, 100069, Beijing, China. yanyxepi@ccmu.edu.cn
Wei Wang
Hanmin Zhu
Mei Li
Jianli Liu
Bangyao Luo
Haibao Xie
Guangjian Zhang
Fuobao Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis has become an important health problem in postmenopausal Chinese women. Bisphosphonates currently are the preferred therapy for treating osteoporosis. However, the use of daily regimen of alendronate in women at risk for osteoporosis has been relatively low in China because of its dosing inconvenience. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly alendronate 70 mg in Chinese, a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study was performed in China. Five hundred and sixty postmenopausal women (< or =85 years old) with osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive either alendronate 70 mg or placebo once-weekly for 12 months. All women received calcium 500 mg daily and vitamin D 200 IU daily. A significant increase in lumbar spine BMD was already evident at 6 months of alendronate treatment (P < 0.001). The alendronate group showed significant increase (P < 0.001) in BMD at 12 months at both the spine and hip when compared with the placebo group (lumbar spine 4.87% vs. 0.4%, femoral neck 2.47% vs. 0.31%, trochanter 3.24% vs. 0.78%, total hip 2.56% vs. 0.28%, respectively). The percentage of women with > or =0% and > or =3% BMD increase in lumbar spine was significantly greater in women with alendronate than placebo (P < 0.001). Significant reduction in urine N-telopeptide (NTx) and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase were evident at 6 and 12 months, respectively, with alendronate treatment. No significant differences in the incidence of adverse experiences and upper gastrointestinal adverse experiences were seen. We conclude that once-weekly alendronate 70 mg is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women.

Indexed as

AgedAlendronateAlkaline PhosphataseBone and BonesBone DensityChinaCollagen Type IDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFemurFemur NeckHumansLumbar VertebraeMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPelvic BonesAlendronateAlkaline PhosphataseCollagen Type Icollagen type I trimeric cross-linked peptidePeptides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.