Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19342542›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2009

Intra-arterial recanalization techniques for patients 80 years or older with acute ischemic stroke: pooled analysis from 4 prospective studies.

A I Qureshi, M F K Suri, A L Georgiadis, G Vazquez, N A Janjua

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Endovascular Stroke Treatment of Nonagenarians.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients over 80 Years of Age.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Interventional stroke therapies in the elderly: are we helping?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A I QureshiZeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. aiqureshi@hotmail.com
M F K Suri
A L Georgiadis
G Vazquez
N A Janjua
Twin Cities Orthopedics · USCentraCare Health System · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Scholar Development Clinical Research (RMI)K12RR023247 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LUEPKER, RUSSELL V · 2005 to 2009
$13.5M
Antihypertensive Treatment in Acute Cerebral HemorrhageR01NS044976 · NINDS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI QURESHI, ADNAN IQBAL · 2004 to 2006
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS 5K12-RR023247-03NCRR NIH HHS K12 RR023247NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044976NINDS NIH HHS R0-1-NS44976-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePrevious studies have demonstrated limited benefit with endovascular procedures such as stent placement in octogenarians. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of intra-arterial recanalization techniques to treat ischemic stroke in patients 80 years or older presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe pooled the data from 4 prospective studies by evaluating intra-arterial recanalization techniques for treatment of ischemic stroke. Clinical and radiologic evaluations were performed before treatment and at 24 hours, 7 to 10 days, and 1 to 3 months after treatment. We performed multivariate analyses to evaluate the effect of ages 80 years and older on angiographic recanalization, favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale of 0-2), and mortality rate at 1 to 3 months.

resultsA total of 101 patients were treated in the 4 protocols. Of these, 24 were 80 years or older. There was no significant difference between the 2 age groups in sex, initial stroke severity, time to treatment, site of vascular occlusion, and rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). In logistic regression analysis, age 80 years or older was associated with a lower likelihood of a favorable outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-1.2; P = .11) and recanalization (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.12-1.1; P = .07) and with higher mortality rate (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.05-9.55; P = .04) after adjusting for study protocol. After adjusting for recanalization in addition to study protocol, the older age group still had a lower likelihood of favorable outcomes (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1; P = .07) and higher mortality rates (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.15-11.36; P = .027).

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that patients 80 years and older are at higher risk for poor outcome at 1 to 3 months following intra-arterial recanalization techniques. This relationship is independent of recanalization rate and symptomatic ICH supporting the role of other mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cerebral ArteriesAcute DiseaseAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaComorbidityEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceProspective StudiesStrokeTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19342542
PMCPMC5674529
OpenAlexW2018604968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.