Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19341838›Full record

ReviewSeminars in nuclear medicine2009

Selected interventions in nuclear medicine: gastrointestinal motor functions.

Suwebatu T Odunsi, Michael Camilleri

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prucalopride: safety, efficacy and potential applications.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suwebatu T OdunsiClinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER) Group, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Michael Camilleri
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Pharmacogenomics of Gastric Function &Weight in ObesityR01DK067071 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CAMILLERI, MICHAEL L. · 2004 to 2020
$4.7M
ALPHA 2 ADRENERGIC CONTROL IN IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROMEK24DK002638 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CAMILLERI, MICHAEL L. · 1999 to 2008
$1.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK002638NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK 02638NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067071NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK 67071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement of gastrointestinal functions by the use of scintigraphy is established in clinical practice and research. The most commonly used test is the gastric-emptying test, which is acknowledged as the gold standard to measure gastric motility and is conducted according to a consensus statement from the national nuclear medicine and motility societies. Other techniques are somewhat more esoteric (eg, measurement of gastric accommodation with single-photon emission computed tomography) or the scintigraphic approach is not the acknowledged gold standard (eg, colonic transit, rectoanal angle, and emptying, esophageal transit). The performance characteristics of many of the scintigraphic measurements have been published and the pros and cons established in the literature. Pharmacologic interventions may also be used during scintigraphy to aid in diagnosis and treatment. Gastrointestinal scintigraphy is an integral and important component of the assessment of gastrointestinal function.

Indexed as

Gastric EmptyingGastrointestinal MotilityGastrointestinal TractGastrointestinal TransitHumansStomachTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID19341838
PMCPMC2694726
OpenAlexW2006597595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.