Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19341446›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2009

Intradermal influenza vaccination of healthy adults using a new microinjection system: a 3-year randomised controlled safety and immunogenicity trial.

Jiri Beran, Arvydas Ambrozaitis, Alvydas Laiskonis, Narseta Mickuviene, Patrick Bacart, Yvan Calozet, Etienne Demanet, Stephane Heijmans, Paul Van Belle, Françoise Weber and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00703651 (Immunogenicity of Two Dosages of Inactivated, Split-Virion Influenza Vaccine Administered by Intradermal Route in Comparison With Intramuscular Vaccination With Vaxigrip® in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00703651 phase2completednot on this map

Immunogenicity of Two Dosages of Inactivated, Split-Virion Influenza Vaccine Administered by Intradermal Route in Comparison With Intramuscular Vaccination With Vaxigrip® in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi CompanyRan2003 to 2006Enrolled1,150ConditionsInfluenza, Orthomyxoviridae Infection, Myxovirus InfectionArmsInactivated, split-virion influenza vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Current trends in polymer microneedle for transdermal drug delivery.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2020
    Review
  11. Progress in Microneedle-Mediated Protein Delivery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Microneedle patches for vaccination in developing countries.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Review
  13. Effective and lesion-free cutaneous influenza vaccination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. Skin immunization with influenza vaccines.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Microneedle patches for vaccine delivery.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2014
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Jiri BeranVaccination and Travel Medicine Centre, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. jiri.beran@vakcinace.cz
Arvydas Ambrozaitis
Alvydas Laiskonis
Narseta Mickuviene
Patrick Bacart
Yvan Calozet
Etienne Demanet
Stephane Heijmans
Paul Van Belle
Françoise Weber
Camille Salamand
Statistics Belgium · BESanofi (France) · FRCentre of Advanced Studies · RUGeneral Practitioners Research Institute · NLHospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics · LTRoyal College of General Practitioners · GBVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntradermal vaccination provides direct and potentially more efficient access to the immune system via specialised dendritic cells and draining lymphatic vessels. We investigated the immunogenicity and safety during 3 successive years of different dosages of a trivalent, inactivated, split-virion vaccine against seasonal influenza given intradermally using a microinjection system compared with an intramuscular control vaccine.

methodsIn a randomised, partially blinded, controlled study, healthy volunteers (1150 aged 18 to 57 years at enrollment) received three annual vaccinations of intradermal or intramuscular vaccine. In Year 1, subjects were randomised to one of three groups: 3 microg or 6 microg haemagglutinin/strain/dose of inactivated influenza vaccine intradermally, or a licensed inactivated influenza vaccine intramuscularly containing 15 microg/strain/dose. In Year 2 subjects were randomised again to one of two groups: 9 microg/strain/dose intradermally or 15 microg intramuscularly. In Year 3 subjects were randomised a third time to one of two groups: 9 microg intradermally or 15 microg intramuscularly. Randomisation lists in Year 1 were stratified for site. Randomisation lists in Years 2 and 3 were stratified for site and by vaccine received in previous years to ensure the inclusion of a comparable number of subjects in a vaccine group at each centre each year. Immunogenicity was assessed 21 days after each vaccination. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

resultsIn Years 2 and 3, 9 microg intradermal was comparably immunogenic to 15 microg intramuscular for all strains, and both vaccines met European requirements for annual licensing of influenza vaccines. The 3 microg and 6 microg intradermal formulations were less immunogenic than intramuscular 15 microg. Safety of the intradermal and intramuscular vaccinations was comparable in each year of the study. Injection site erythema and swelling was more common with the intradermal route.

conclusionAn influenza vaccine with 9 microg of haemagglutinin/strain given using an intradermal microinjection system showed comparable immunogenic and safety profiles to a licensed intramuscular vaccine, and presents a promising alternative to intramuscular vaccination for influenza for adults younger than 60 years.

trial registration(Clinicaltrials.gov) NCT00703651.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInjections, IntradermalMaleMicroinjectionsMiddle AgedVaccines, InactivatedYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID19341446
PMCPMC2676311
OpenAlexW2081182462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.