ArticleJournal of human hypertension2009
Profiles of mortality among Chinese hypertensive patients in Hong Kong: a cohort study.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Hypertension in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Structured Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Review
- Effect of different single and combined antihypertensive drug regimens on the mortality of critical care patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- The healthcare burden of hypertension in Asia.Heart Asia · 2013Article
- Simvastatin combined with nifedipine enhances endothelial cell protection by inhibiting ROS generation and activating Akt phosphorylation.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We studied the profiles of all-cause and cardiovascular (CVS) mortality among users of different antihypertensive classes in a Chinese population. From electronic patient records, a cohort study was conducted among 18,338 patients who ever newly prescribed an alpha-blocker, thiazide diuretic, beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker (CCB) or agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) without drug discontinuation or switching in the public primary-care sector in a large Territory of Hong Kong during January 2004-June 2007. The odds ratios of mortality (all-cause and CVS) were evaluated according to the prescribed antihypertensive drug classes by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. A total of 823 deaths (4.5%) were reported during the study period. The crude proportions of all-cause mortality were highest in alpha-blockers (6.2%) and CCB (5.7%), but lowest in beta-blockers (2.8%). Compared with CCB, patients on thiazide diuretics were shown to have statistically significantly lower all-cause (adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) 0.75, 95% CI 0.60, 0.93, P=0.010) and CVS mortality (aHR 0.40, 95% CI 0.21, 0.78, P=0.007), but the 95% CI of the odds ratios of the major drug classes overlapped. When each drug class was used as a reference group, or when patients with only uncomplicated hypertension were included, their respective 95% CI similarly overlapped. Antihypertensive drug classes were associated with statistically comparable odds of all-cause and CVS mortality. This finding from real-life clinical practice further supports the position statements from international guidelines, which recommend that the major antihypertensive drug classes are suitable for initiating pharmacotherapy for the management of hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.