Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19339951›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2009

How HIV changes its tropism: evolution and adaptation?

Donald E Mosier

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donald E MosierDepartment of Immunology and Microbial Science, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. dmosier@scripps.edu
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Developing RANTES analogues as topical strategies to prevent HIV transmissionU19AI076981 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LEDERMAN, MICHAEL MARCEL · 2008 to 2010
$5.7M
HIV CORECEPTOR SWITCHINGR01AI052778 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI MOSIER, DONALD E · 2003 to 2010
$3.8M
HIV Coreceptor SwitchingR56AI052778 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI MOSIER, DONALD E · 2011 to 2011
$474k
NIAID NIH HHS AI052778NIAID NIH HHS AI076981NIAID NIH HHS AI079135NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052778NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI052778NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI076981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo present recent information on the evolution of coreceptor use from CCR5 alone to CCR5 and CXCR4, the impact CCR5 inhibitors have on this process, and new insights into HIV-1 binding to CD4 and CCR5. RECENT

findingsThe findings that are summarized include resistance to CCR5 inhibitors, genotypic predictors of coreceptor use, the link between coreceptor use and cell tropism, and new data on CCR5 structure and function. SUMMARY: Resistance to CCR5 inhibitors is uncommon, and frequently involves selection of minor populations of R5X4 virus. Genotypic predictors of coreceptor use need to take into account the entire envelope sequence, not just V3. Genetic polymorphisms in humans that affect CCR5 or chemokines that bind CCR5 affect not only virus entry but also immune reconstitution.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalVirus AttachmentCD4 AntigensDrug Resistance, ViralHIV-1HIV Fusion InhibitorsHIV InfectionsHumansPolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4Receptors, HIVCD4 AntigensHIV Fusion InhibitorsReceptors, CCR5Receptors, CXCR4Receptors, HIV

Identifiers

PMID19339951
PMCPMC2697388
OpenAlexW1963580119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.