ReviewThe American journal of psychiatry2009
Genomewide association studies: history, rationale, and prospects for psychiatric disorders.
Review in The American journal of psychiatry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00006418 (Molecular Genetics of Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 189 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Molecular Genetics of Schizophrenia
Who cites it
189 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The genetics of drug-related movement disorders, an umbrella review of meta-analyses.Molecular psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- A genome-wide association meta-analysis of prognostic outcomes following cognitive behavioural therapy in individuals with anxiety and depressive disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2019Pooled it
- Somatic, positive and negative domains of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.Psychological medicine · 2016Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of gene expression quantitative trait loci in brain.Translational psychiatry · 2014Pooled it
- Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.Molecular psychiatry · 2013Pooled it
- Association at SYNE1 in both bipolar disorder and recurrent major depression.Molecular psychiatry · 2013Pooled it
- A mega-analysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder.Molecular psychiatry · 2013Pooled it
- Genome-wide association study of major depressive disorder: new results, meta-analysis, and lessons learned.Molecular psychiatry · 2012Pooled it
- Genome-wide association study of suicide attempts in mood disorder patients.The American journal of psychiatry · 2010Pooled it
- Trial
- Additive genetic contribution to symptom dimensions in major depressive disorder.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2016Trial
- Human genome-guided identification of memory-modulating drugs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Trial
- Pharmacometabolomic mapping of early biochemical changes induced by sertraline and placebo.Translational psychiatry · 2013Trial
- The Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research genome-wide association study.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2012Trial
- Cross-Cultural Consortium on Irritability (C3I): An International Network for Research on Cultural Similarities and Differences in Irritability.JAACAP open · 2026Article
- Genetic analysis of psychosis Biotypes: shared Ancestry-adjusted polygenic risk and unique genomic associations.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- Review
- Post-traumatic stress disorder: evolving conceptualization and evidence, and future research directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025Article
- Endophenotype 2.0: updated definitions and criteria for endophenotypes of psychiatric disorders, incorporating new technologies and findings.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Article
129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe authors conducted a review of the history and empirical basis of genomewide association studies (GWAS), the rationale for GWAS of psychiatric disorders, results to date, limitations, and plans for GWAS meta-analyses.
methodA literature review was carried out, power and other issues discussed, and planned studies assessed.
resultsMost of the genomic DNA sequence differences between any two people are common (frequency >5%) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Because of localized patterns of correlation (linkage disequilibrium), 500,000 to 1,000,000 of these SNPs can test the hypothesis that one or more common variants explain part of the genetic risk for a disease. GWAS technologies can also detect some of the copy number variants (deletions and duplications) in the genome. Systematic study of rare variants will require large-scale resequencing analyses. GWAS methods have detected a remarkable number of robust genetic associations for dozens of common diseases and traits, leading to new pathophysiological hypotheses, although only small proportions of genetic variance have been explained thus far and therapeutic applications will require substantial further effort. Study design issues, power, and limitations are discussed. For psychiatric disorders, there are initial significant findings for common SNPs and for rare copy number variants, and many other studies are in progress.
conclusionsGWAS of large samples have detected associations of common SNPs and of rare copy number variants with psychiatric disorders. More findings are likely, since larger GWAS samples detect larger numbers of common susceptibility variants, with smaller effects. The Psychiatric GWAS Consortium is conducting GWAS meta-analyses for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, autism, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Based on results for other diseases, larger samples will be required. The contribution of GWAS will depend on the true genetic architecture of each disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.