Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19338502›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2009

In search of a unifying theory of complex brain evolution.

Leah Krubitzer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. TopoNets: High performing vision and language models with brain-like topography.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Predictability of cortico-cortical connections in the mammalian brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The evolution of brain architectures for predictive coding and active inference.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. "Natural Laboratory Complex" for novel primate neuroscience.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A dual larynx motor networks hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leah KrubitzerCenter for Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University of California-Davis, Davis, California 95618, USA. lakrubitzer@ucdavis.edu
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX &THALAMUSR01NS035103 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI KRUBITZER, LEAH ANN · 1997 to 2014
$4.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neocortex is the part of the brain that is involved in perception, cognition, and volitional motor control. In mammals it is a highly dynamic structure that has been dramatically altered in different lineages, and these alterations account for the remarkable variations in behavior that species exhibit. When we consider how this structure changes and becomes more complex in some mammals such as humans, we must also consider how the alterations that occur at macro levels of organization, such as the level of the individual and social system, as well as micro levels of organization, such as the level of neurons, synapses and molecules, impact the neocortex. It is also important to consider the constraints imposed on the evolution of the neocortex. Observations of highly conserved features of cortical organization that all mammals share, as well as the convergent evolution of similar features of organization, indicate that the constraints imposed on the neocortex are pervasive and restrict the avenues along which evolution can proceed. Although both genes and the laws of physics place formidable constraints on the evolution of all animals, humans have evolved a number of mechanisms that allow them to loosen these constraints and often alter the course of their own evolution. While this cortical plasticity is a defining feature of mammalian neocortex, it appears to be exaggerated in humans and could be considered a unique derivation of our species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionConsensusModels, TheoreticalAnatomy, ComparativeAnimalsBrainGrowth and DevelopmentHumansModels, BiologicalPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID19338502
PMCPMC2666944
OpenAlexW2073324295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.