ArticleDrug safety2009
Drug safety information through the internet: the experience of an Italian website.
Article in Drug safety, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How to promote adverse drug reaction reports using information systems - a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Pooled it
- The Additional Value of an E-Mail to Inform Healthcare Professionals of a Drug Safety Issue: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands.Drug safety · 2013Trial
- Communication on drug safety-related matters to patients: is it even more significant in this digital era?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2020Article
- Drugs and Birth Defects: a knowledge database providing risk assessments based on national health registers.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Article
- Promoting spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting in hospitals using a hyperlink to the online reporting form: an ecological study in Portugal.Drug safety · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Internet may play a crucial role in the prompt provision of updated drug safety information. Nevertheless, limited knowledge of the English language among healthcare professionals or suboptimal search skills constitute barriers to widespread and appropriate use of the Internet for this purpose in Italy. In order to provide accurate information on drug safety and to promote the reporting of adverse drug reactions, in 1999 the clinical section of the Italian Society of Pharmacology created the website www.farmacovigilanza.org, financially supported by a non-profit foundation. The website promptly and independently provides news published in the international literature on drug safety, translated into Italian. The site also contains specific sections dedicated to adverse reactions to herbal products and cosmetic preparations.
objectivesThe aim of this paper was to describe the number and characteristics of users and the most intensively visited sections of the website. Furthermore, in September 2006, 300 registered users who had accessed a registered users area aimed specifically at health professionals more than 20 times in the preceding 12 months received a ten-item multiple choice questionnaire via e-mail, to assess satisfaction with the accuracy and promptness of information provided, text comprehension and other information sources for drug-related issues. We hereby describe the results of the survey, after careful analysis of the questionnaires.
resultsUp until July 2007, the site had over 600 000 direct accesses and 9760 healthcare professionals registered to use the site. A total of 108 responses to the e-mailed questionnaire were received (response rate = 36%), of which 103 were analysed; five were excluded due to missing information. Overall, the majority of responders judged the information on the site as objective and understandable. More than 85% of participants declared that the site has influenced their opinion and attitudes toward the safety of medicines. In particular, responders said that they pay more attention to drug interactions and to the safety profile of newly marketed drugs, and spend more time on communicating the risks of drugs used by their patients. Specifically, responders stated that they pay more attention to drug interactions (87.7%), newly marketed drugs (68.5%), herbal remedies (56.2%), drugs in patients at increased risk (42.5%), drugs in pregnant women (42.5%) and cosmetics (13.7%).
conclusionsThe website www.farmacovigilanza.org appears to be an effective tool that provides users of the site with independent, relevant and reliable safety information. It was found to influence (and possibly improve) the quality of prescribing of a large proportion of the general practitioners who responded to our questionnaire, and our results indicate a high appreciation of the information found on the website. Moreover, the survey disclosed that there is a substantial need for such information in the national language by healthcare professionals. We think that our approach can serve as a model for similar initiatives in countries elsewhere in the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19338382What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.