Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19337311›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2009

The FAS ligand promoter polymorphism, rs763110 (-844C>T), contributes to cancer susceptibility: evidence from 19 case-control studies.

Zhizhong Zhang, Lixin Qiu, Meilin Wang, Na Tong, Jin Li, Zhengdong Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association between CD95L polymorphism and cervical cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. CD95 rs1800682 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk: evidence from a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Susceptibility to oral cancers with CD95 and CD95L promoter SNPs may vary with the site and gender.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bladder cancer epidemiology and genetic susceptibility.Journal of biomedical research · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhizhong ZhangDepartment of Molecular and Genetic Toxicology, Cancer Center of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lixin Qiu
Meilin Wang
Na Tong
Jin Li
Zhengdong Zhang
Nanjing Medical University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potentially functional polymorphism, rs763110 (-844C>T), in the promoter region of the FAS ligand (FASL) gene, has been implicated in cancer risk, but individually published studies show inconclusive results. To derive a more precise estimation of the association between the FASL rs763110 and risk of cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of 19 published studies that included 11,105 cancer cases and 11,372 controls. We used odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the strength of the associations. Overall, the rs763110 CT and TT variant genotypes were associated with a significantly reduced cancer risk of all cancer types in different genetic models (homozygote comparison: OR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.95, P(heterogeneity)=0.001; heterozygote comparison: OR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.72-0.95, P(heterogeneity)<0.001; dominant model comparison: OR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.94, P(heterogeneity)<0.001; and recessive model comparison: OR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96, P(heterogeneity)=0.074). In the stratified analyses, the risk remained for studies of the smoking-related cancers and Asian populations, or population-based studies in all the genetic models. Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis suggests that the FASL rs763110 T allele has a possible protective effect on cancer risk.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticAllelesCase-Control StudiesFas Ligand ProteinHeterozygoteHumansModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsOdds RatioRiskFas Ligand Protein

Identifiers

PMID19337311
PMCPMC2986648
OpenAlexW2131695469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.