Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19335912›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2009

Gastric tonometry versus cardiac index as resuscitation goals in septic shock: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

Fernando Palizas, Arnaldo Dubin, Tomas Regueira, Alejandro Bruhn, Elias Knobel, Silvio Lazzeri, Natalio Baredes, Glenn Hernández

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04693923 (Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04693923 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients: Pathophysiological Determinants, and Relation to Changes in Systemic, Regional and Microcirculatory Blood Flow

TypeinterventionalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2021 to 2023Enrolled42ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsFluid challenge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Enhanced external counterpulsation improves cardiac function in Beagles after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2020
    Article
  7. Prognostic Value of Venous to Arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference during Early Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hemodynamic monitoring development: helpful technology or expensive luxury?Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Reliability of measurement techniques for the hepato-splanchnic region in multiple-trauma patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Year in review 2008: Critical Care--cardiology.Critical care (London, England) · 2009
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fernando PalizasClínica Bazterrica, Unidad de Terapia Intensiva, Billinghurst 2074 (y Juncal) (CP 1425), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Arnaldo Dubin
Tomas Regueira
Alejandro Bruhn
Elias Knobel
Silvio Lazzeri
Natalio Baredes
Glenn Hernández
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLHospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín" · ARHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResuscitation goals for septic shock remain controversial. Despite the normalization of systemic hemodynamic variables, tissue hypoperfusion can still persist. Indeed, lactate or oxygen venous saturation may be difficult to interpret. Our hypothesis was that a gastric intramucosal pH-guided resuscitation protocol might improve the outcome of septic shock compared with a standard approach aimed at normalizing systemic parameters such as cardiac index (CI).

methodsThe 130 septic-shock patients were randomized to two different resuscitation goals: CI >or= 3.0 L/min/m2 (CI group: 66 patients) or intramucosal pH (pHi) >or= 7.32 (pHi group: 64 patients). After correcting basic physiologic parameters, additional resuscitation consisting of more fluids and dobutamine was started if specific goals for each group had not been reached. Several clinical data were registered at baseline and during evolution. Hemodynamic data and pHi values were registered every 6 hours during the protocol. Primary end point was 28 days' mortality.

resultsBoth groups were comparable at baseline. The most frequent sources of infection were abdominal sepsis and pneumonia. Twenty-eight day mortality (30.3 vs. 28.1%), peak Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System scores (32.6 +/- 6.5 vs. 33.2 +/- 4.7) and ICU length of stay (12.6 +/- 8.2 vs. 16 +/- 12.4 days) were comparable. A higher proportion of patients exhibited values below the specific target at baseline in the pHi group compared with the CI group (50% vs. 10.9%; P < 0.001). Of 32 patients with a pHi < 7.32 at baseline, only 7 (22%) normalized this parameter after resuscitation. Areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves to predict mortality at baseline, and at 24 and 48 hours were 0.55, 0.61, and 0.47, and 0.70, 0.90, and 0.75, for CI and pHi, respectively.

conclusionsOur study failed to demonstrate any survival benefit of using pHi compared with CI as resuscitation goal in septic-shock patients. Nevertheless, a normalization of pHi within 24 hours of resuscitation is a strong signal of therapeutic success, and in contrast, a persistent low pHi despite treatment is associated with a very bad prognosis in septic-shock patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdultAgedDobutamineFemaleGastric MucosaHemodynamicsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIntensive Care UnitsIschemiaLength of StayMaleManometryMiddle AgedAdrenergic beta-AgonistsDobutamine

Identifiers

PMID19335912
PMCPMC2689488
OpenAlexW2027228635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.