Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19335547›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of experimental pathology2009

Back to basics--how the evolution of the extracellular matrix underpinned vertebrate evolution.

Julie Huxley-Jones, John W Pinney, John Archer, David L Robertson, Raymond P Boot-Handford

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of experimental pathology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Mechanisms of assembly and remodelling of the extracellular matrix.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  3. The evolution of tenascins.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. Knockout of the gene encoding the extracellular matrix protein SNED1 results in early neonatal lethality and craniofacial malformations.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Mechanotransduction and fibrosis.Journal of biomechanics · 2014
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie Huxley-JonesWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Matrix Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. julie.x.huxley-jones@gsk.com
John W Pinney
John Archer
David L Robertson
Raymond P Boot-Handford
University of Manchester · GBWellcome Centre for Cell-Matrix Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C515412/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex substrate that is involved in and influences a spectrum of behaviours such as growth and differentiation and is the basis for the structure of tissues. Although a characteristic of all metazoans, the ECM has elaborated into a variety of tissues unique to vertebrates, such as bone, tendon and cartilage. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of the molecular evolution of the ECM. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ECM genes represent a pivotal family of proteins the evolution of which appears to have played an important role in the evolution of vertebrates.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCiona intestinalisExtracellular MatrixExtracellular Matrix ProteinsGene DuplicationHumansVertebratesExtracellular Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19335547
PMCPMC2676697
OpenAlexW2138524687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.