ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2009
Melding a New 3-Dimensional Agarose Colony Assay with the E(max) Model to Determine the Effects of Drug Combinations on Cancer Cells.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current evidence for histone deacetylase inhibitors in pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Review
- Different changes in protein and phosphoprotein levels result from serum starvation of high-grade glioma and adenocarcinoma cell lines.Journal of proteome research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of our study was two-fold: (i) develop a robust 3D colony assay methodology to interrogate drug combinations using GelCount and (ii) to develop 2-drug combinations that might be useful in the clinic for the treatment of high-grade gliomas. We used three glioma cell lines (U251MG, SNB19, and LNZ308) and two adenocarcinoma cell lines (MiaPaCa and SW480) grown as colonies in a two-tiered agarose cultures. We evaluated two-drug combinations of difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), carboplatin, vorinostat (SAHA), and docetaxel. To analyze for antitumor efficacy we used GelCount to measure the area under the curve for tumor colony volumes (microm(2) x OD) in each plate. The non-linear dose-response E(max) model and the interaction index based on the Loewe additivity are applied to calculate two-drug synergy, additive, and antagonistic interactions. For glioblastoma cell lines, (i) carboplatin followed by DFMO was synergistic or additive in 2/3 cell lines, (ii) carboplatin before SAHA was synergistic in 1 cell line, (iii) carboplatin before docetaxel was synergistic in 2/3 cell lines and partially additive in the third, (iv) SAHA before docetaxel was synergistic in 1/3 cell lines, (v) docetaxel before DFMO was additive or partially active in 3/3 cell lines, and (vi) DFMO plus SAHA was inactive regardless of order. In the MiaPaCA cell line, synergy occurred when DFMO followed carboplatin and, at short exposure times, when SAHA was combined with carboplatin (regardless of order). In the SW480 cell line synergy occurred only in short exposures for carboplatin followed by docetaxel; additive and mixed partial effects were also seen with DFMO plus carboplatin or docetaxel (regardless of order), carboplatin before DFMO, carboplatin before SAHA, and docetaxel before carboplatin. In conclusion, by applying the Gelcount automated counting and sizing of colonies and the use of E(max) and Loewe models to define drug interactions, we can reliably define drug combination efficacy as a function of log dose and duration of drug exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.