ArticleTherapeutic drug monitoring2009
Molecular similarity methods for predicting cross-reactivity with therapeutic drug monitoring immunoassays.
Article in Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly sensitive therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in serum by targeted mass spectrometry in comparison to ELISA data.Clinical proteomics · 2024Article
- Repurposable Drugs for Immunotherapy and Strategies to Find Candidate Drugs.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Suspected Macrolide Allergies in Children.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Application of grouping and read-across for the evaluation of parabens of different chain lengths with a particular focus on endocrine properties.Archives of toxicology · 2021Article
- Targeted Strategy to Analyze Antiepileptic Drugs in Human Serum by LC-MS/MS and LC-Ion Mobility-MS.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Data on hydroxychloroquine interference with urine laboratory testing.Data in brief · 2019Article
- Diagnostic pitfalls and laboratory test interference after hydroxychloroquine intoxication: A case report.Toxicology reports · 2019Article
- Accidental intoxications in toddlers: lack of cross-reactivity of vilazodone and its urinary metabolite M17 with drug of abuse screening immunoassays.BMC clinical pathology · 2019Article
- Discovery of a Novel HDAC2 Inhibitor by a Scaffold-Merging Hybrid Query.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2015Article
- Cross-reactivity of steroid hormone immunoassays: clinical significance and two-dimensional molecular similarity prediction.BMC clinical pathology · 2014Article
- Using cheminformatics to predict cross reactivity of "designer drugs" to their currently available immunoassays.Journal of cheminformatics · 2014Article
- Identification of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 Potentiators Using Virtual High-Throughput Screening.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2010Article
- Using molecular similarity to highlight the challenges of routine immunoassay-based drug of abuse/toxicology screening in emergency medicine.BMC emergency medicine · 2009Article
- A Difficult Challenge for the Clinical Laboratory: Accessing and Interpreting Manufacturer Cross-Reactivity Data for Immunoassays Used in Urine Drug Testing.Academic pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunoassays are used for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), yet may suffer from cross-reacting compounds able to bind the assay antibodies in a manner similar to the target molecule. To our knowledge, there has been no investigation using computational tools to predict cross-reactivity with TDM immunoassays. The authors used molecular similarity methods to enable calculation of structural similarity for a wide range of compounds (prescription and over-the-counter medications, illicit drugs, and clinically significant metabolites) to the target molecules of TDM immunoassays. Utilizing different molecular descriptors (MDL public keys, functional class fingerprints, and pharmacophore fingerprints) and the Tanimoto similarity coefficient, the authors compared cross-reactivity data in the package inserts of immunoassays marketed for in vitro diagnostic use. Using MDL public keys and the Tanimoto similarity coefficient showed a strong and statistically significant separation between cross-reactive and non-cross-reactive compounds. Thus, 2-dimensional shape similarity of cross-reacting molecules and the target molecules of TDM immunoassays provides a fast chemoinformatics methods for a priori prediction of potential of cross-reactivity that might be otherwise undetected. These methods could be used to reliably focus cross-reactivity testing on compounds with high similarity to the target molecule and limit testing of compounds with low similarity and ultimately with a very low probability of cross-reacting with the assay in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.