ArticleCirculation2009
Molecular imaging of innate immune cell function in transplant rejection.
Article in Circulation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Loss of Cathepsin Z enhances pro-inflammatory macrophage responses and promotes tissue regeneration.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026Article
- Molecular probes for in vivo optical imaging of immune cells.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Advancements in noninvasive techniques for transplant rejection: from biomarker detection to molecular imaging.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Macrophage tracking with USPIO imaging and T2 mapping predicts immune rejection of transplanted stem cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors induce M1 polarization of macrophages: Feasibility of targeted imaging in inflammatory response in vivo.Cell & bioscience · 2023Article
- Training vs. Tolerance: The Yin/Yang of the Innate Immune System.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Single-cell analysis of graft-infiltrating host cells identifies caspase-1 as a potential therapeutic target for heart transplant rejection.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Reciprocal organ interactions during heart failure: a position paper from the ESC Working Group on Myocardial Function.Cardiovascular research · 2021Review
- Molecular probes for selective detection of cysteine cathepsins.Organic & biomolecular chemistry · 2021Review
- Imaging alloreactive T cells provides early warning of organ transplant rejection.JCI insight · 2021Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of stem cell-macrophage interactions with ferumoxytol and ferumoxytol-derived nanoparticles.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2019Review
- Molecular Imaging of the Heart.Comprehensive Physiology · 2019Review
- Acute and chronic phagocyte determinants of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.Seminars in immunopathology · 2018Review
- Application of animal and human PET in cardiac research.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2018Review
- Molecular Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection: Animal Experiments and Prospects.Transplantation · 2017Review
- Detection of Stem Cell Transplant Rejection with Ferumoxytol MR Imaging: Correlation of MR Imaging Findings with Those at Intravital Microscopy.Radiology · 2017Article
- Towards clinically translatableNature reviews. Materials · 2017Article
- Efferocytosis and Outside-In Signaling by Cardiac Phagocytes. Links to Repair, Cellular Programming, and Intercellular Crosstalk in Heart.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Characterization of Cardiac Dynamics in an Acute Myocardial Infarction Model by Four-Dimensional Optoacoustic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Theranostics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical detection of transplant rejection by repeated endomyocardial biopsy requires catheterization and entails risks. Recently developed molecular and cellular imaging techniques that visualize macrophage host responses could provide a noninvasive alternative. Yet, which macrophage functions may provide useful markers for detecting parenchymal rejection remains uncertain. METHODS AND
resultsWe transplanted isografts from B6 mice and allografts from Balb/c mice heterotopically into B6 recipients. In this allograft across major histocompatability barriers, the transplanted heart undergoes predictable progressive rejection, leading to graft failure after 1 week. During rejection, crucial macrophage functions, including phagocytosis and release of proteases, render these abundant innate immune cells attractive imaging targets. Two or 6 days after transplantation, we injected either a fluorescent protease sensor or a magnetofluorescent phagocytosis marker. Histological and flow cytometric analyses established that macrophages function as the major cellular signal source. In vivo, we obtained a 3-dimensional functional map of macrophages showing higher phagocytic uptake of magnetofluorescent nanoparticles during rejection using magnetic resonance imaging and higher protease activity in allografts than in isografts using tomographic fluorescence. We further assessed the sensitivity of imaging to detect the degree of rejection. In vivo imaging of macrophage response correlated closely with gradually increasing allograft rejection and attenuated rejection in recipients with a genetically impaired immune response resulting from a deficiency in recombinase-1 (RAG-1(-/-)).
conclusionsMolecular imaging reporters of either phagocytosis or protease activity can detect cardiac allograft rejection noninvasively, promise to enhance the search for novel tolerance-inducing strategies, and have translational potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.