Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19332470›Full record

ArticleCirculation2009

Molecular imaging of innate immune cell function in transplant rejection.

Thomas Christen, Matthias Nahrendorf, Moritz Wildgruber, Filip K Swirski, Elena Aikawa, Peter Waterman, Koichi Shimizu, Ralph Weissleder, Peter Libby

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Molecular Imaging of the Heart.Comprehensive Physiology · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Application of animal and human PET in cardiac research.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Towards clinically translatableNature reviews. Materials · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas ChristenCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Matthias Nahrendorf
Moritz Wildgruber
Filip K Swirski
Elena Aikawa
Peter Waterman
Koichi Shimizu
Ralph Weissleder
Peter Libby
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Systems Biology · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Translational Program of Excellence in NanotechnologyU01HL080731 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WEISSLEDER, MD, PHD, RALPH · 2005 to 2009
$14.9M
PET/MRI of cardiac repairR01HL096576 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NAHRENDORF, MATTHIAS · 2009 to 2017
$2.8M
Imaging of Cardiac Transplant RejectionR01HL095629 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NAHRENDORF, MATTHIAS · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095629NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096576NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL080731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical detection of transplant rejection by repeated endomyocardial biopsy requires catheterization and entails risks. Recently developed molecular and cellular imaging techniques that visualize macrophage host responses could provide a noninvasive alternative. Yet, which macrophage functions may provide useful markers for detecting parenchymal rejection remains uncertain. METHODS AND

resultsWe transplanted isografts from B6 mice and allografts from Balb/c mice heterotopically into B6 recipients. In this allograft across major histocompatability barriers, the transplanted heart undergoes predictable progressive rejection, leading to graft failure after 1 week. During rejection, crucial macrophage functions, including phagocytosis and release of proteases, render these abundant innate immune cells attractive imaging targets. Two or 6 days after transplantation, we injected either a fluorescent protease sensor or a magnetofluorescent phagocytosis marker. Histological and flow cytometric analyses established that macrophages function as the major cellular signal source. In vivo, we obtained a 3-dimensional functional map of macrophages showing higher phagocytic uptake of magnetofluorescent nanoparticles during rejection using magnetic resonance imaging and higher protease activity in allografts than in isografts using tomographic fluorescence. We further assessed the sensitivity of imaging to detect the degree of rejection. In vivo imaging of macrophage response correlated closely with gradually increasing allograft rejection and attenuated rejection in recipients with a genetically impaired immune response resulting from a deficiency in recombinase-1 (RAG-1(-/-)).

conclusionsMolecular imaging reporters of either phagocytosis or protease activity can detect cardiac allograft rejection noninvasively, promise to enhance the search for novel tolerance-inducing strategies, and have translational potential.

Indexed as

AnimalsCathepsinsFlow CytometryGraft RejectionHeart TransplantationHomeodomain ProteinsImmunohistochemistryMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred StrainsMice, KnockoutMyocardiumNanoparticlesPhagocytesCathepsinsHomeodomain ProteinsRAG-1 protein

Identifiers

PMID19332470
PMCPMC2676889
OpenAlexW2002373777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.