Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19330515›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2009

High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization analysis reveals unanticipated complexity of genetic deficiencies on chromosome V in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Martin R Jones, Shu Yi Chua, Nigel J O'Neil, Robert C Johnsen, Ann M Rose, David L Baillie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome sequencing ofGenome research · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin R JonesDepartment of Medical Genetics, Life Sciences Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada. mrjones@sfu.ca
Shu Yi Chua
Nigel J O'Neil
Robert C Johnsen
Ann M Rose
David L Baillie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic rearrangements are widely used in Caenorhabditis elegans research but many remain incompletely characterized at the physical level. We have used oligo-array comparative genomic analysis to assess the physical structure of 20 deficiencies and a single duplication of chromosome V. We find that while deletions internal to the chromosome appear simple in structure, terminal deletions are complex, containing duplications in addition to the deletion. Additionally, we confirm that transposon-induced deficiencies contain breakpoints that initiate at Tc1 elements. Finally, 13 of these deficiencies are known to suppress recombination far beyond the extent of the deletion. These deficiencies fall into two classes: strong and weak suppressors of adjacent recombination. Analysis of the deleted regions in these deficiencies reveals no common physical sites to explain the observed differences in recombination suppression. However, we find a strong correlation between the size of the rearranged chromosome and the severity of recombination suppression. Rearranged chromosomes that have a minor effect on recombination fall within 2% of normal chromosome size. Our observations highlight the use of array-based approaches for the analysis of rearranged genomes, revealing previously unidentified deficiency characteristics and addressing biologically relevant questions.

Indexed as

Genes, HelminthAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansChromosome BreakageChromosome DeletionChromosome MappingComparative Genomic HybridizationCrossing Over, GeneticGene RearrangementGenome, HelminthModels, GeneticMutationRecombination, GeneticTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.