Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19330302›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2009

Mutation analysis in Indian children with achondroplasia - utility of molecular diagnosis.

S J Patil, M Banerjee, S R Phadke, B Mittal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S J PatilDepartment of Medical Genetics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate, Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
M Banerjee
S R Phadke
B Mittal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMutation analysis in Indian children with achondroplasia.

methodsWe studied 11 sporadic cases of achondroplasia. Mutation analysis was done by PCR/RFLP (Polymerase chain reaction/Restriction fragment length polymorphism) method.

resultsNine of the 11 cases had mutation G-->A at 1138 nucleotide position in transmembrane domain of fibroblast growth-factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene. Substitution G-->A is a common recurrent mutation reported worldwide. In two cases we could not detect any common mutation and also in entire region of transmembrane domain sequenced. There is possibility of mutation in the other regions of FGFR3 gene in these two cases.

conclusionFurther study of these two cases is needed in order to define other genotypes resulting in achondroplasia. Postnatal diagnosis of achondroplasia depends on clinical and radiological features. Mutation detection is mainly useful for prenatal diagnosis.

Indexed as

AchondroplasiaChildDNA Mutational AnalysisHumansIndiaMolecular BiologyPoint MutationReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.