Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19329799›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2009

Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an assessment of MGIT 960, MODS and nitrate reductase assay and fluoroquinolone cross-resistance.

Rose A Devasia, Amondrea Blackman, Carolyn May, Svetlana Eden, Teresa Smith, Nancy Hooper, Fernanda Maruri, Charles Stratton, Ayumi Shintani, Timothy R Sterling

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-commercial phenotypic assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance: a systematic review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Treatment outcomes among patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Analysis ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Tools to Alleviate the Drug Resistance inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Genotype analysis of ofloxacin-resistant multidrug-resistantThe Indian journal of medical research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Direct observation therapy with appropriate treatment regimens was associated with a decline in second-line drug-resistant tuberculosis in Taiwan.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Second-line drug susceptibility breakpoints for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the MODS assay.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Microcolonies in fluoroquinolone agar proportion susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an indicator of drug resistance.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. MODS accreditation process for regional reference laboratories in Peru: validation by GenoType® MTBDRplus.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rose A DevasiaDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-2582, USA. rose.devasia@vanderbilt.edu
Amondrea Blackman
Carolyn May
Svetlana Eden
Teresa Smith
Nancy Hooper
Fernanda Maruri
Charles Stratton
Ayumi Shintani
Timothy R Sterling
Vanderbilt University · USMaryland State Department of Education · USTennessee Department of Health · US

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) KL2KL2RR024977 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
Fluoroquinolone Resistance in M. TuberculosisR01AI063200 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STERLING, TIMOTHY R · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
Mentoring in HIV and Tuberculosis ResearchK24AI065298 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STERLING, TIMOTHY R · 2005 to 2014
$1.6M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024977-02NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI 65298NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI 063200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity and time to results of mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960, microscopic observation drug susceptibility (MODS) assay and nitrate reductase assay (NRA) compared with the gold standard agar proportion method (PM), and to determine whether there is cross-resistance between older-generation fluoroquinolones and moxifloxacin.

methodsMycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from culture-confirmed tuberculosis patients from 2002 to 2007 were tested for ofloxacin (2 mg/L) resistance by PM and MGIT 960. All isolates from 2005 and 2006 were also tested by MODS and NRA. Ofloxacin-resistant isolates by PM were further tested by all four methods using ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. For each ofloxacin-resistant isolate, two ofloxacin-susceptible isolates were tested against all three fluoroquinolones using all four methods.

resultsOf the 797 M. tuberculosis isolates, 19 (2.4%) were ofloxacin-resistant by PM. MGIT 960 had 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 83%-100%) and specificity (95% CI, 99.5%-100%). Of the 797 isolates, 239 were from 2005 to 2006 and 6 of these (2.5%) were resistant by PM. MODS had 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 61%-100%) and specificity (95% CI, 98%-100%). NRA had 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 61%-100%) and 98.7% specificity (95% CI, 96%-99.6%). The median time to results was shorter using MGIT 960 (8 days), MODS (6 days) or NRA (9 days) compared with PM (21 days) (P < 0.001). All 19 ofloxacin-resistant isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin by PM.

conclusionsMGIT 960, MODS and NRA are sensitive and specific and more rapid than PM for identifying fluoroquinolone resistance in M. tuberculosis. Ofloxacin resistance was associated with cross-resistance to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopyMycobacterium tuberculosisNitrate ReductaseSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesNitrate Reductase

Identifiers

PMID19329799
PMCPMC2680343
OpenAlexW2153878059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.