Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19329653›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2009

Identification of a putative protein profile associated with tamoxifen therapy resistance in breast cancer.

Arzu Umar, Hyuk Kang, Annemieke M Timmermans, Maxime P Look, Marion E Meijer-van Gelder, Michael A den Bakker, Navdeep Jaitly, John W M Martens, Theo M Luider, John A Foekens and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. ENPP1 is an innate immune checkpoint of the anticancer cGAMP-STING pathway in breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Arzu UmarErasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Josephine Nefkens Inst., Dept. of Medical Oncology, Laboratory of Genomics and Proteomics of Breast Cancer, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, Be 430c, P. O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.umar@erasmusmc.nl
Hyuk Kang
Annemieke M Timmermans
Maxime P Look
Marion E Meijer-van Gelder
Michael A den Bakker
Navdeep Jaitly
John W M Martens
Theo M Luider
John A Foekens
Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić
Cancer Genomics Centre · NLPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USMeertens Institute · NL

Funding

WORKSHOP AND TRAINING ACTIVITIESP41RR018522 · NCRR · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2003 to 2011
$25.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR018522NCRR NIH HHS RR18522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tamoxifen resistance is a major cause of death in patients with recurrent breast cancer. Current clinical factors can correctly predict therapy response in only half of the treated patients. Identification of proteins that are associated with tamoxifen resistance is a first step toward better response prediction and tailored treatment of patients. In the present study we intended to identify putative protein biomarkers indicative of tamoxifen therapy resistance in breast cancer using nano-LC coupled with FTICR MS. Comparative proteome analysis was performed on approximately 5,500 pooled tumor cells (corresponding to approximately 550 ng of protein lysate/analysis) obtained through laser capture microdissection (LCM) from two independently processed data sets (n = 24 and n = 27) containing both tamoxifen therapy-sensitive and therapy-resistant tumors. Peptides and proteins were identified by matching mass and elution time of newly acquired LC-MS features to information in previously generated accurate mass and time tag reference databases. A total of 17,263 unique peptides were identified that corresponded to 2,556 non-redundant proteins identified with > or = 2 peptides. 1,713 overlapping proteins between the two data sets were used for further analysis. Comparative proteome analysis revealed 100 putatively differentially abundant proteins between tamoxifen-sensitive and tamoxifen-resistant tumors. The presence and relative abundance for 47 differentially abundant proteins were verified by targeted nano-LC-MS/MS in a selection of unpooled, non-microdissected discovery set tumor tissue extracts. ENPP1, EIF3E, and GNB4 were significantly associated with progression-free survival upon tamoxifen treatment for recurrent disease. Differential abundance of our top discriminating protein, extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer, was validated by tissue microarray in an independent patient cohort (n = 156). Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer levels were higher in therapy-resistant tumors and significantly associated with an earlier tumor progression following first line tamoxifen treatment (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.80; p = 0.002). In summary, comparative proteomics performed on laser capture microdissection-derived breast tumor cells using nano-LC-FTICR MS technology revealed a set of putative biomarkers associated with tamoxifen therapy resistance in recurrent breast cancer.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAmino Acid SequenceBreast NeoplasmsChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMolecular Sequence DataNeoplasm ProteinsPeptide MappingTamoxifenTandem Mass SpectrometryTrypsinNeoplasm ProteinsTamoxifenTrypsin

Identifiers

PMID19329653
PMCPMC2690491
OpenAlexW2161616458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.