ReviewCold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology2008
Toward stem cell systems biology: from molecules to networks and landscapes.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Charting cellular differentiation trajectories with Ricci flow.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Self-organization of whole-gene expression through coordinated chromatin structural transition.Biophysics reviews · 2021Review
- A practical way to prepare primer human chondrocyte culture.Journal of orthopaedics · 2016Article
- Modeling the epigenetic attractors landscape: toward a post-genomic mechanistic understanding of development.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Review
- Classification of transient behaviours in a time-dependent toggle switch model.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Article
- Cell-type-specific predictive network yields novel insights into mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and cell fate.PloS one · 2013Article
- Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity.Nature cell biology · 2012Article
- New insights into the mechanisms of embryonic stem cell self-renewal under hypoxia: a multifactorial analysis approach.PloS one · 2012Article
- Techniques for analysing pattern formation in populations of stem cells and their progeny.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Inferring cell cycle feedback regulation from gene expression data.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2011Article
- Stem cell self-renewal: lessons from bone marrow, gut and iPS toward clinical applications.Leukemia · 2011Review
- Review
- Systematic tracking of cell fate changes.Nature biotechnology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The last few years have seen significant advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of stem-cell-fate specification. New and emerging high-throughput techniques, as well as increasingly accurate loss-of-function perturbation techniques, are allowing us to dissect the interplay among genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, and signaling mechanisms in stem-cell-fate determination with ever-increasing fidelity (Boyer et al. 2005, 2006; Ivanova et al. 2006; Loh et al. 2006; Cole et al. 2008; Jiang et al. 2008; Johnson et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2008; Marson et al. 2008; Mathur et al. 2008). Taken together, recent reports using these new techniques demonstrate that stem-cell-fate specification is an extremely complex process, regulated by multiple mutually interacting molecular mechanisms involving multiple regulatory feedback loops. Given this complexity and the sensitive dependence of stem cell differentiation on signaling cues from the extracellular environment, how are we best to develop a coherent quantitative understanding of stem cell fate at the systems level? One approach that we and other researchers have begun to investigate is the application of techniques derived in the computational disciplines (mathematics, physics, computer science, etc.) to problems in stem cell biology. Here, we briefly sketch a few pertinent results from the literature in this area and discuss future potential applications of computational techniques to stem cell systems biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.