Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19329576›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology2008

Toward stem cell systems biology: from molecules to networks and landscapes.

B D MacArthur, A Ma'ayan, I R Lemischka

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Systematic tracking of cell fate changes.Nature biotechnology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

B D MacArthurDepartment of Gene and Cell Medicine, The Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
A Ma'ayan
I R Lemischka
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USStem Cell Institute · PATherapeutics Clinical Research · US

Funding

System Biology Center in New YorkP50GM071558 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ZAPH, SUSANA NEVES · 2007 to 2017
$22.8M
Global & Systems Level Analyses of Cell Fate RegulationR01GM078465 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI LEMISCHKA, IHOR R · 2007 to 2015
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071558NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last few years have seen significant advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of stem-cell-fate specification. New and emerging high-throughput techniques, as well as increasingly accurate loss-of-function perturbation techniques, are allowing us to dissect the interplay among genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, and signaling mechanisms in stem-cell-fate determination with ever-increasing fidelity (Boyer et al. 2005, 2006; Ivanova et al. 2006; Loh et al. 2006; Cole et al. 2008; Jiang et al. 2008; Johnson et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2008; Marson et al. 2008; Mathur et al. 2008). Taken together, recent reports using these new techniques demonstrate that stem-cell-fate specification is an extremely complex process, regulated by multiple mutually interacting molecular mechanisms involving multiple regulatory feedback loops. Given this complexity and the sensitive dependence of stem cell differentiation on signaling cues from the extracellular environment, how are we best to develop a coherent quantitative understanding of stem cell fate at the systems level? One approach that we and other researchers have begun to investigate is the application of techniques derived in the computational disciplines (mathematics, physics, computer science, etc.) to problems in stem cell biology. Here, we briefly sketch a few pertinent results from the literature in this area and discuss future potential applications of computational techniques to stem cell systems biology.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSystems BiologyAnimalsCell DifferentiationEpigenesis, GeneticFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansMiceProteomicsSignal TransductionStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID19329576
PMCPMC2738746
OpenAlexW2132770070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.