Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19329279›Full record

ReviewJournal of autoimmunity

Why can't we find a new treatment for SLE?

Robert Eisenberg

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of autoimmunity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Quality Care Assessment in Gout.Current rheumatology reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Epigenetic involvement in etiopathogenesis and implications in treatment of systemic lupus erythematous.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert EisenbergDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, 756 BRBII/III, 421 Curie Blvd, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6160, USA. raemd@mail.med.upenn.edu
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

EXPERIMENTAL INDUCTION OF SLE BY ALTERED IAR01AR034156 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LUNING PRAK, ELINE TJETSKE · 1986 to 2012
$3.5M
Mechanisms of autoreactivity in SLER01AI063626 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EISENBERG, ROBERT A. · 2005 to 2009
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063626NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR034156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No new therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus has been approved. In the last decade, the development of several novel compounds has been pursued for lupus, but so far nothing has been proven to be effective. This review discusses some of the reasons why it may be so difficult to demonstrate that a novel therapy is effective for this disease. These include the complexity of the disease itself; the lack of reliable outcome measures; our limited understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease; the propensity of lupus patients to have bad outcomes and to react to medicines in unusual ways; the heterogeneity of the patient population; the unpredictable course of disease in individual patients; and the lack of reliable biomarkers. Although some of the tested targeted compounds that are apparently based on strong preclinical and mechanistic data may indeed not be effective therapies for SLE, it is hard not to believe that among the various specific agents now being tested that at least some of them should downregulate the abnormal immunoregulation characteristic of SLE, and thus be clinically effective. We need to be persistent and imaginative in identifying these effective agents and proving their efficacy so that they may be widely used in our lupus populations.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicResearch DesignBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID19329279
PMCPMC2699771
OpenAlexW1997113795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.