Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19327389›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2009

Afferent connections of the parabrachial nucleus in C57BL/6J mice.

K Tokita, T Inoue, J D Boughter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ParabrachialiScience · 2025
    Article
  3. Serotonin neurons are necessary for tonic sodium intake inhibition.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Retinorecipient areas in the common marmoset (Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K TokitaDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 855 Monroe Avenue, Suite 515, Memphis, TN 38163, USA. ktokita@utmem.edu
T Inoue
J D Boughter
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USShowa University · JP

Funding

SENSORY CODING IN TASTER01DC000353 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI BOUGHTER, JOHN D · 1989 to 2014
$4.5M
MINORITY PREDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMF31DC000353 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DEWULF, VALERIE D · 1998 to 1999
–
NIDCD NIH HHS DC000353NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC000353NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the mouse is an experimental model with an increasing importance in various fields of neuroscience, the characteristics of its central gustatory pathways have not yet been well documented. Recent electrophysiological studies using the rat and hamster have revealed that taste processing in the brainstem gustatory relays is under the strong influence of inputs from forebrain gustatory structures. In the present study, we investigated the organization of afferent projections to the mouse parabrachial nucleus (PbN), which is located at a key site between the brainstem and gustatory, viscerosensory and autonomic centers in the forebrain. We made injections of the retrograde tracer fluorogold centered around the "waist" area of the PbN, whose neurons are known to be highly responsive to taste stimuli. Retrogradely labeled neurons were found in the infralimbic, dysgranular and agranular insular cortex as well as the claustrum; the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and the substantia innominata; the central nucleus of the amygdala; the lateral and medial preoptic areas, the paraventricular, the dorsomedial, the ventromedial, the arcuate, and the lateral hypothalamic areas; the periaqueductal gray, the substantia nigra pars compacta, and the ventral tegmental area; the supratrigeminal nucleus, rostral and caudal nucleus of the solitary tract; the parvicellular intermediate and gigantocellular reticular nucleus; the caudal and interpolar divisions of the spinal trigeminal nucleus, dorsomedial spinal trigeminal nucleus, and the area postrema. Numbers of labeled neurons in the main components of the gustatory system including the insular cortex, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, central nucleus of the amygdala, lateral hypothalamus, and rostral nucleus of the solitary tract were quantified. These results are basically consistent with those of the previous rat and hamster studies, but some species differences were found. Functional implications of these afferent inputs are discussed with an emphasis on their role in taste.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsBrain StemFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProsencephalonTaste

Identifiers

PMID19327389
PMCPMC2705209
OpenAlexW2064212430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.