Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19327032›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of clinical psychology2009

APOE-4 genotype and neurophysiological vulnerability to Alzheimer's and cognitive aging.

Susan Bookheimer, Alison Burggren

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of clinical psychology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aging · 2020
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neurology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan BookheimerDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. sbook@ucla.edu
Alison Burggren
Neurobehavioral Systems · US

Funding

FUNCTIONAL MRI FOR EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ALZHEIMER'SR01AG013308 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BOOKHEIMER, SUSAN Y · 1995 to 2011
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG013308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many years before receiving a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), patients experience evidence of cognitive decline. Recent studies using a variety of brain imaging technologies have detected subtle changes in brain structure and function in normal adults with a genetic risk for AD; these brain changes have similar pathological features as AD, and some appear to be predictive of future cognitive decline. This review examines the most recent data on brain changes in genetic risk for AD and discusses the benefits and potential risks of detecting individuals at risk.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseGenotypeAgedAllelesApolipoprotein E4BrainCognition DisordersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPositron-Emission TomographyRisk FactorsApolipoprotein E4

Identifiers

PMID19327032
PMCPMC3118550
OpenAlexW2148926112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.