Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19325518›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2009

Current status of older and new purine nucleoside analogues in the treatment of lymphoproliferative diseases.

Tadeusz Robak, Anna Korycka, Ewa Lech-Maranda, Pawel Robak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The hypoxia-adenosine link during inflammation.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 2,6-Di-chloro-9-(2',3',5'-tri-O-acetyl-β-d-ribo-furanos-yl)-9H-purine.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tadeusz RobakDepartment of Hematology, Medical University of Lodz and Copernicus Memorial Hospital, 93-510 Lodz, Ciolkowskiego 2 Str., Poland. robaktad@csk.umed.lodz.pl
Anna Korycka
Ewa Lech-Maranda
Pawel Robak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the past few years more and more new cytotoxic agents active in the treatment of hematological malignancies have been synthesized and become available for either in vitro studies or clinical trials. Among them the class of antineoplastic drugs belonging to the purine nucleoside analogues group (PNAs) plays an important role. Three of them: pentostatin (DCF), cladribine (2-CdA) and fludarabine (FA) were approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Recently three novel PNAs: clofarabine (CAFdA), nelarabine (ara-G) and forodesine (immucillin H, BCX-1777) have been synthesized and introduced into preclinical studies and clinical trials. These agents seem to be useful mainly for the treatment of human T-cell proliferative disorders and they are currently undergoing clinical trials in lymphoid malignancies. However, there are also several studies suggesting the role of these drugs in B-cell malignancies. This review will summarize current knowledge concerning the mechanism of action, pharmacologic properties, clinical activity and toxicity of PNAs accepted for use in clinical practice, as well as new agents available for clinical trials.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHumansLymphoproliferative DisordersPurine NucleosidesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsPurine Nucleosides

Identifiers

PMID19325518
PMCPMC6253893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.