Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1932550›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1991

Measurement of mass transport and reaction parameters in bulk solution using photobleaching. Reaction limited binding regime.

E N Kaufman, R K Jain

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E N KaufmanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-3890.
R K Jain
Carnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

MACROMOLECULAR TRANSPORT IN NEOPLASTIC CAPILLARY BEDSR01CA036902 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAIN, RAKESH K. · 1985 to 1993
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-36902NCI NIH HHS CA-49742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) has been used previously to investigate the kinetics of binding to biological surfaces. The present study adapts and further develops this technique for the quantification of mass transport and reaction parameters in bulk media. The technique's ability to obtain the bulk diffusion coefficient, concentration of binding sites, and equilibrium binding constant for ligand/receptor interactions in the reaction limited binding regime is assessed using the B72.3/TAG-72 monoclonal antibody/tumor associated antigen interaction as a model in vitro system. Measurements were independently verified using fluorometry. The bulk diffusion coefficient, concentration of binding sites and equilibrium binding constant for the system investigated were 6.1 +/- 1.1 x 10(-7) cm2/s, 4.4 +/- 0.6 x 10(-7) M, and 2.5 +/- 1.6 x 10(7) M-1, respectively. Model robustness and the applicability of the technique for in vivo quantification of mass transport and reaction parameters are addressed. With a suitable animal model, it is believed that this technique is capable of quantifying mass transport and reaction parameters in vivo.

Indexed as

Binding Sites, AntibodyModels, BiologicalAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmCell MembraneImmunoglobulin GKineticsMathematicsMicePhotochemistrySolutionsSpectrometry, FluorescenceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmImmunoglobulin GSolutions

Identifiers

PMID1932550
PMCPMC1260103
OpenAlexW2148224917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.