ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2009
Determining the repertoire of IGH gene rearrangements to develop molecular markers for minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of an immunoglobulin gene rearrangement assay based on multiplex PCR in detecting bone marrow involvement in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood research · 2017Article
- Minimal Residual Disease Detection and EvolvedFrontiers in immunology · 2016Article
- Immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene high-throughput sequencing quantifies minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and predicts post-transplantation relapse and survival.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2014Article
- Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.Current opinion in oncology · 2012Review
- Article
- Sensitive and specific measurement of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular markers for minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia were identified by determining, at the time of diagnosis, the repertoire of rearrangements of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene using segment-specific variable (V), diversity (D), and junctional (J) primers in two different studies that involved a total study population of 75 children and 18 adults. This strategy, termed repertoire analysis, was compared with the conventional strategy of identifying markers using family-specific V, D, and J primers for a variety of antigen receptor genes. Repertoire analysis detected significantly more markers for the major leukemic clone than did the conventional strategy, and one or more IgH rearrangements that were suitable for monitoring the major clone were detected in 96% of children and 94% of adults. Repertoire analysis also detected significantly more IGH markers for minor clones. Some minor clones were quite large and a proportion of them would not be able to be detected by a minimal residual disease test directed to the marker for the major clone. IGH repertoire analysis at diagnosis has potential advantages for the identification of molecular markers for the quantification of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases. An IGH marker enables very sensitive quantification of the major leukemic clone, and the detection of minor clones may enable early identification of additional patients who are prone to relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.