ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2009
Mechanisms of base selection by human single-stranded selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- What is in a name? Rethinking SMUG1 in genome maintenance.NAR cancer · 2025Review
- Incorporation and Repair of Epigenetic Intermediates as Potential Chemotherapy Agents.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Smug1 alleviates the reproductive toxicity of 5-FU through functioning in rRNA quality control.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Repair and DNA Polymerase Bypass of Clickable Pyrimidine Nucleotides.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- UV-DDB stimulates the activity of SMUG1 during base excision repair of 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine moieties.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- A regulatory network comprising let-7 miRNA and SMUG1 is associated with good prognosis in ER+ breast tumours.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Chemical and enzymatic modifications of 5-methylcytosine at the intersection of DNA damage, repair, and epigenetic reprogramming.PloS one · 2022Article
- Ablation ofGenes · 2021Article
- Intrinsic Strand-Incision Activity of Human UNG: Implications for Nick Generation in Immunoglobulin Gene Diversification.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Boron-containing nucleosides as tools for boron-neutron capture therapy.American journal of cancer research · 2021Review
- Retracted Article: Divergent synthesis of 5-substituted pyrimidine 2'-deoxynucleosides and their incorporation into oligodeoxynucleotides for the survey of uracil DNA glycosylases.Chemical science · 2020Article
- Long non-coding RNA AC023794.4-201 exerts a tumor-suppressive function in laryngeal squamous cell cancer and may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Base Excision Repair in the Immune System: Small DNA Lesions With Big Consequences.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Excision of uracil from DNA by hSMUG1 includes strand incision and processing.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- DNA Repair Molecular Beacon assay: a platform for real-time functional analysis of cellular DNA repair capacity.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Base excision repair of oxidative DNA damage: from mechanism to disease.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2017Review
- Role of Base Excision "Repair" Enzymes in Erasing Epigenetic Marks from DNA.Chemical reviews · 2016Review
- Measurement of Postreplicative DNA Metabolism and Damage in the Rodent Brain.Chemical research in toxicology · 2015Article
- Role of base excision repair in maintaining the genetic and epigenetic integrity of CpG sites.DNA repair · 2015Review
- DNA methylation, its mediators and genome integrity.International journal of biological sciences · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
hSMUG1 (human single-stranded selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glyscosylase) is one of three glycosylases encoded within a small region of human chromosome 12. Those three glycosylases, UNG (uracil-DNA glycosylase), TDG (thymine-DNA glyscosylase), and hSMUG1, have in common the capacity to remove uracil from DNA. However, these glycosylases also repair other lesions and have distinct substrate preferences, indicating that they have potentially redundant but not overlapping physiological roles. The mechanisms by which these glycosylases locate and selectively remove target lesions are not well understood. In addition to uracil, hSMUG1 has been shown to remove some oxidized pyrimidines, suggesting a role in the repair of DNA oxidation damage. In this paper, we describe experiments in which a series of oligonucleotides containing purine and pyrimidine analogs have been used to probe mechanisms by which hSMUG1 distinguishes potential substrates. Our results indicate that the preference of hSMUG1 for mispaired uracil over uracil paired with adenine is best explained by the reduced stability of a duplex containing a mispair, consistent with previous reports with Escherichia coli mispaired uracil-DNA glycosylase. We have also extended the substrate range of hSMUG1 to include 5-carboxyuracil, the last in the series of damage products from thymine methyl group oxidation. The properties used by hSMUG1 to select damaged pyrimidines include the size and free energy of solvation of the 5-substituent but not electronic inductive properties. The observed distinct mechanisms of base selection demonstrated for members of the uracil glycosylase family help explain how considerable diversity in chemical lesion repair can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.