Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19324822›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2009

Testing limits to adaptation along altitudinal gradients in rainforest Drosophila.

Jon R Bridle, Sedef Gavaz, W Jason Kennington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evolution of species' range and niche in changing environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Environmental variation and biotic interactions limit adaptation at ecological margins: lessons from rainforestPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Limits to adaptation along environmental gradients.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  13. Quantitative genetic variance and multivariate clines in the Ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Geographic range limits of species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jon R BridleDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK. jon.bridle@bristol.ac.uk
Sedef Gavaz
W Jason Kennington

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that evolution can generate rapid and dramatic shifts in the ecological tolerance of a species, what prevents populations adapting to expand into new habitat at the edge of their distributions? Recent population genetic models have focused on the relative costs and benefits of migration between populations. On the one hand, migration may limit adaptive divergence by preventing local populations from matching their local selective optima. On the other hand, migration may also contribute to the genetic variance necessary to allow populations to track these changing optima. Empirical evidence for these contrasting effects of gene flow in natural situations are lacking, largely because it remains difficult to acquire. Here, we develop a way to explore theoretical models by estimating genetic divergence in traits that confer stress resistance along similar ecological gradients in rainforest Drosophila. This approach allows testing for the coupling of clinal divergence with local density, and the effects of genetic variance and the rate of change of the optimum on the response to selection. In support of a swamping effect of migration on phenotypic divergence, our data show no evidence for a cline in stress-related traits where the altitudinal gradient is steep, but significant clinal divergence where it is shallow. However, where clinal divergence is detected, sites showing trait means closer to the presumed local optimum have more genetic variation than sites with trait means distant from their local optimum. This pattern suggests that gene flow also aids a sustained response to selection.

Indexed as

AltitudeEcosystemAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionDemographyDrosophilaFemaleMaleModels, BiologicalTrees

Identifiers

PMID19324822
PMCPMC2677227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.