ReviewAnnals of hematology1991
Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: biological features and search for adequate treatment.
Review in Annals of hematology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for treating newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in older adults.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Age and the biology of acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 1992Article
- Metronomic therapy with oral 6-mercaptopurine in elderly acute myeloid leukemia: A prospective pilot study.South Asian journal of cancerArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AML in elderly patients is a heterogeneous disease which is characterized by a number of unfavorable features such as development, cytogenetics, blast cell differentiation, and poor treatment response. Specifically, the association between a higher incidence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities in elderly patients and poor prognosis has been well documented. Low treatment response may be due to the specific biology of AML in this patient group, but also to host-specific factors such as higher treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Treatment tolerance cannot be judged on grounds of chronological age alone; risk factor analysis with regard to performance status, organ function, and underlying systemic disease need to be considered as well. For effective induction treatment in elderly patients, instant and intensive chemotherapy appears to be necessary, while delayed treatment or administration of supportive care alone provide unsatisfactory results. Standard-dose ara-C/anthracycline-containing regimens are the treatment of choice in patients with good performance status. However, patients with a WHO grading of greater than 3 might rather benefit from reduced regimens such as low-dose ara-C. At present, greatest improvement of AML treatment in elderly patients can be expected from an improvement of supportive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1932295What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.