Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1932295›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology1991

Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: biological features and search for adequate treatment.

V Heinemann, U Jehn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V HeinemannDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Federal Republic of Germany.
U Jehn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AML in elderly patients is a heterogeneous disease which is characterized by a number of unfavorable features such as development, cytogenetics, blast cell differentiation, and poor treatment response. Specifically, the association between a higher incidence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities in elderly patients and poor prognosis has been well documented. Low treatment response may be due to the specific biology of AML in this patient group, but also to host-specific factors such as higher treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Treatment tolerance cannot be judged on grounds of chronological age alone; risk factor analysis with regard to performance status, organ function, and underlying systemic disease need to be considered as well. For effective induction treatment in elderly patients, instant and intensive chemotherapy appears to be necessary, while delayed treatment or administration of supportive care alone provide unsatisfactory results. Standard-dose ara-C/anthracycline-containing regimens are the treatment of choice in patients with good performance status. However, patients with a WHO grading of greater than 3 might rather benefit from reduced regimens such as low-dose ara-C. At present, greatest improvement of AML treatment in elderly patients can be expected from an improvement of supportive care.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAge FactorsCausalityHumansLeukemia, MyeloidMorbidity

Identifiers

PMID1932295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.