Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19322556›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2009

[Current clinical-neurophysiological findings in absence epilepsies].

H Stefan, S Rampp

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

H StefanEpilepsiezentrum Erlangen/Neurologie, Universitätsklinik, Erlangen, Germany. hermann.stefan@uk-erlangen.de
S Rampp
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the international classification of epileptic seizures (1981) generalized seizures present ictal signs indicating seizure onset in both hemispheres whereas focal seizures present ictal signs pointing to one hemisphere at seizure onset. Recent neurophysiological studies using MEG, EEG, and fMRI suggest that in case of idiopathic generalized absence epilepsies, activity predominates in specific networks, which include frontoparietal cortical as well as subcortical areas of both hemispheres. In these network regions, epileptic activity can occur circumscribed and focal as spike or spike-wave activity but also widely distributed, bilateral, and homologous. As a consequence to the classification of "generalized" epileptic seizures and syndromes, it might be possible to distinguish a subgroup: regional bilateral homologous epilepsies. These must be distinguished from a pure culture of focal frontal lobe epilepsies, which can also be accompanied by the lead symptom of absences.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainBrain MappingEpilepsy, AbsenceHumansNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID19322556
OpenAlexW44517816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.