ReviewDer Nervenarzt2009
[What is migraine?].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between Contingent Negative Variation and afterimage duration in migraine patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine is a multifactorial and heterogeneous disorder. Diagnostic criteria have been established by the International Headache Society, however these are only supportive in terms of definition. The pathophysiology involves neuronal and vascular phenomena. The former is supported by the cortical spreading depression being the aura correlate and by brainstem and hypothalamic activation during the pain phase; the latter is suggested by the association between migraine and cardiovascular disease and findings of pathological vasoreactivity and endothelial dysfunction. Triptans and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists show only a relative migraine-specific action; up to 30% of patients are nonresponders. Despite a clear genetic component, the discovery of specific genes for common forms of migraine remains elusive. Electrophysiological studies consistently indicate a characteristic "dyshabituation" concurring with clinical features of altered sensory perception. The age- and sex-specific pattern along with the effect of external factors on the course of migraine argue in favor of the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms. Knowledge about migraine is still limited, which hampers a definition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.