Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19322554›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2009

[What is migraine?].

M Schürks

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M SchürksDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 02215-1204, Boston, USA. mschuerks@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is a multifactorial and heterogeneous disorder. Diagnostic criteria have been established by the International Headache Society, however these are only supportive in terms of definition. The pathophysiology involves neuronal and vascular phenomena. The former is supported by the cortical spreading depression being the aura correlate and by brainstem and hypothalamic activation during the pain phase; the latter is suggested by the association between migraine and cardiovascular disease and findings of pathological vasoreactivity and endothelial dysfunction. Triptans and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists show only a relative migraine-specific action; up to 30% of patients are nonresponders. Despite a clear genetic component, the discovery of specific genes for common forms of migraine remains elusive. Electrophysiological studies consistently indicate a characteristic "dyshabituation" concurring with clinical features of altered sensory perception. The age- and sex-specific pattern along with the effect of external factors on the course of migraine argue in favor of the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms. Knowledge about migraine is still limited, which hampers a definition.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainHumansMigraine DisordersNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID19322554
OpenAlexW98792047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.