Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19322521›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2009

Highlights from the I international symposium of thrombosis and anticoagulation in internal medicine, October 23-25, 2008, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Renato D Lopes, Richard C Becker, David Garcia, Elaine M Hylek, Christopher B Granger, Dayse M Lourenço, Helena B Nader, Francisco H A Maffei, Fernando H Y Cesena, José C Nicolau and 9 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Renato D LopesDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Richard C Becker
David Garcia
Elaine M Hylek
Christopher B Granger
Dayse M Lourenço
Helena B Nader
Francisco H A Maffei
Fernando H Y Cesena
José C Nicolau
Ari Timmerman
Ana T Rocha
Edison F de Paiva
Helio P Guimaraes
Antonio C Carvalho
Elbio A D'Amico
Carlos A Moreira-Filho
José M Aldrighi
Antonio C Lopes
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRDuke University · USBoston Medical Center · USInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia · BRMedecell (Brazil) · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of thrombosis and anticoagulation in clinical practice is rooted firmly in several fundamental constructs that can be applied both broadly and globally. Awareness and the appropriate use of anticoagulant therapy remain the keys to prevention and treatment. However, to assure maximal efficacy and safety, the clinician must, according to the available evidence, choose the right drug, at the right dose, for the right patient, under the right indication, and for the right duration of time. The first International Symposium of Thrombosis and Anticoagulation in Internal Medicine was a scientific program developed by clinicians for clinicians. The primary objective of the meeting was to educate, motivate and inspire internists, cardiologists and hematologists by convening national and international visionaries, thought-leaders and dedicated clinician-scientists in Sao Paulo, Brazil. This article is a focused summary of the symposium proceedings.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsCongresses as TopicThrombosisBrazilAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID19322521
OpenAlexW2087383649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.