Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19322241›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2009

The quest for action potentials in C. elegans neurons hits a plateau.

Shawn R Lockery, Miriam B Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An unusual potassium conductance protectsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The synaptic organization in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Multisensory Integration inBrain sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. From head to tail: a neuromechanical model of forward locomotion inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shawn R LockeryInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA. shawn@uoregon.edu
Miriam B Goodman

Funding

Molecular Basis of Sensory Transduction in C. elegansR01NS047715 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B · 2004 to 2017
$4.9M
NEURONAL AND THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL ORIENTATIONR01MH051383 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LOCKERY, SHAWN R · 1999 to 2016
$4.7M
Neurogenetic analysis of value-based decision makingR21MH112105 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LOCKERY, SHAWN R · 2017 to 2018
$405k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH051383NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112105NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The small size and high resistance of C. elegans neurons makes them sensitive to the random opening of single ion channels, probably rendering codes that are based on classical, all-or-none action potentials unworkable. The recent discovery in C. elegans of a special class of regenerative events known as plateau potentials introduces the possibility of digital neural codes. Such codes would solve the problem of representing information in nervous systems in which action potentials are unreliable.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansNeurons

Identifiers

PMID19322241
PMCPMC3951993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.