Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19322225›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2009

Smoking cessation and periodontal health--a missed opportunity?

Penny Hodge, Viv Binnie

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Smoking Cessation on Periodontal Tissues.International dental journal · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Penny HodgeDental School, Medical Faculty, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Viv Binnie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

designThis was a cohort study. COHORT SELECTION: A longstanding prospective study was carried out of a birth cohort born in Dunedin (New Zealand) in 1972-1973. EXPOSURE MEASUREMENT: Periodontal examinations of the study participants were carried out when they reached the age of 26 and 32 years by calibrated examiners; smoking exposure was measured by questioning at ages 15, 18, 21, 26 and 32 years. Socioeconomic status (SES) was measured at the age of 26 years by categorising adult occupation using standard New Zealand occupation indices. Dental visiting behaviour was assessed by questioning at age 25 and 32 years. DATA ANALYSIS: Chi-square tests were used to examine the statistical significance of differences observed with categorical dependent variables. Analysis of variance was used for continuous variables. Logistic regression modelling was used to examine smoking exposure and periodontitis prevalence and incidence while controlling for sex, SES, dental plaque accumulation and the use of dental services.

resultsComplete data were available for 810 individuals of whom 48.9% had smoked at some point (31.5% were current smokers). Table 1 shows the prevalence, for a selection of smoking exposure groups of attachment loss at age 32 and the odds ratio compared with never-smokers and Table 2 the incidence of 3+ mm attachment loss. Sites with >5 mm attachment loss and were more likely to be incident cases after age 26 (OR, 5.2 and 3.2, respectively). Two thirds of new cases in individuals older than 26 years were attributable to smoking. There were no significant differences in periodontal health between never-smokers and those who had quit smoking after age 26.

conclusionsCurrent and long-term smoking in young adults is detrimental to periodontal health, but smoking cessation may be associated with a relatively rapid improvement in the periodontium.

Identifiers

PMID19322225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.