Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19321568›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of clinical nutrition2009

Early determinants of development: a lipid perspective.

Susan E Carlson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Epigenetic mechanisms for nutrition determinants of later health outcomes.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Childhood obesity: are genetic differences involved?The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Susan E CarlsonDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA. scarlson@kumc.edu

Funding

DHA Supplementation and Pregnancy OutcomeR01HD047315 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARLSON, SUSAN E, COLOMBO, JOHN A. · 2006 to 2016
$4.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD047315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article results from an International Life Sciences Institute workshop on early nutritional determinants of health and development. The presentation on lipids focused mainly on the longer-chain products of the essential fatty acids, particularly docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3), and cognitive development as among the most studied lipids and outcomes, respectively, in early human nutrition. Because there have been several recent reviews on this topic, the present review takes a broader perspective with respect to both early development and lipids: an expanded research agenda is plausible on the basis of observations from some human studies and from animal studies. Other lipids known to be provided in variable amounts to infants through human milk are cholesterol and gangliosides. Short sections address the current state of knowledge and some questions that could be pursued.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentAgingAnimalsAttentionBrainCholesterol, DietaryCognitionDocosahexaenoic AcidsGangliosidesHuman DevelopmentHumansLipidsMemoryModels, AnimalCholesterol, DietaryDocosahexaenoic AcidsGangliosidesLipids

Identifiers

PMID19321568
PMCPMC2677004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.