Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19321287›Full record

Trial reportPatient education and counseling2009

Use of and reactions to a tailored CD-ROM designed to enhance oncologist-patient communication: the SCOPE trial intervention.

Celette Sugg Skinner, Kathryn I Pollak, David Farrell, Maren K Olsen, Amy S Jeffreys, James A Tulsky

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Patient education and counseling, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Do patient attributes predict oncologist empathic responses and patient perceptions of empathy?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2010
    Trial
  8. Empathy and boundary turbulence in cancer communication.Patient education and counseling · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Closing the patient-oncologist communication gap: a review of historic and current efforts.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Celette Sugg SkinnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9066, USA. Celette.Skinner@UTSouthwestern.edu
Kathryn I Pollak
David Farrell
Maren K Olsen
Amy S Jeffreys
James A Tulsky

Funding

Enhancing Patient-Oncologist CommunicationR01CA100387 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLAK, KATHRYN I · 2003 to 2013
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssess use of and reactions to an interactive, tailored CD-ROM to enhance oncologist-patient communication.

methodsParticipating oncologists (n=48) agreed to have patient interactions audio recorded, be randomly assigned to receive/not receive a CD-ROM, have CD-ROM usage monitored (intervention group) and complete a follow-up survey.

resultsTwenty-one of 24 in the intervention group reported using the CD-ROM. Median usage minutes were 63.8. At follow-up, oncologists rated the CD-ROM from 1 ("none" or "not at all helpful") to 5 ("a great deal" or "very helpful"). Mean responses were: 3.1 and 3.0 for 2 items assessing perceived impact on communications, 3.8-4.0 for 6 items assessing perceived helpfulness, 3.0 and 3.10 for 2 items assessing impact on affecting oncologists' communication with patients and assistance with challenging conversations, respectively, and 3.6 for whether using the CD-ROM was worth their time. Self-report of how much oncologists had used the covered skills before and after intervention showed a perceived increase (2.8 before and 3.2 after).

conclusionsFindings suggest the tailored interactive CD-ROM has promise for use and acceptance among oncologists. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If ultimately found effective in changing oncologist's communication with patients, the CD-ROM's widespread dissemination should be explored.

Indexed as

CD-ROMCommunicationComputer-Assisted InstructionEducational MeasurementPatient Education as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID19321287
PMCPMC2841286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.