Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19320529›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2009

Management of patients presenting with acute psychotic episodes of schizophrenia.

Pierre Thomas, Köksal Alptekin, Mihai Gheorghe, Mauro Mauri, José Manuel Olivares, Michael Riedel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Acute agitation conditions].Der Nervenarzt · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Antipsychotic agents: efficacy and safety in schizophrenia.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2012
    Article
  13. Review
  14. The management of psychiatric emergencies.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Research in people with psychosis risk syndrome: a review of the current evidence and future directions.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Pierre ThomasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Lille Medical School, Lille, France. pthomas@chru-lille.fr
Köksal Alptekin
Mihai Gheorghe
Mauro Mauri
José Manuel Olivares
Michael Riedel
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RODokuz Eylül University · TRLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversité de Lille · FRUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initial management of patients with schizophrenia presenting to psychiatric emergency departments with an acute psychotic episode requires rapid decisions to be made by physicians concerning the treatment of individuals who are likely to be relatively uncooperative, agitated and lacking insight. The treatment decision must be adapted to the individual characteristics and needs of each patient. This article reviews the issues from the perspective of the initial management of acute psychosis as it is currently practised in Europe, and discusses the pragmatic implications for initial treatment decisions and the elaboration of a long-term treatment plan. Initially, administration of antipsychotics to control psychotic symptoms and benzodiazepines to control agitation represents the cornerstone of treatment. Oral medication is preferable to injectable forms wherever possible, and atypical antipsychotics are to be preferred over conventional agents because of their lower risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects, which are a major determinant of poor adherence to treatment. Whatever antipsychotic is chosen by the physician during the initial period, it is likely that it will need to be continued for many years, and it is thus important to take into account the long-term safety profile of the drug chosen, particularly in relation to extrapyramidal adverse effects, metabolic complications and quality of life. Building a therapeutic alliance with the patient and his/her family or carers is an important element that should be included in the initial management of psychosis. The long-term goal should be to minimize the risk of psychotic relapse through adequate treatment adherence.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor AgitationSchizophreniaSecondary PreventionSex CharacteristicsSubstance-Related DisordersSuicideAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19320529
OpenAlexW2029946903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.