Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19320528›Full record

ArticleCNS drugs2009

Cytochrome P450 2D6 genotyping: potential role in improving treatment outcomes in psychiatric disorders.

Julia Kirchheiner, Cristina Rodriguez-Antona

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CNS drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biomarkers in development of psychotropic drugs.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia KirchheinerInstitute of Pharmacology of Natural Products and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. julia.kirchheiner@uni-ulm.de
Cristina Rodriguez-Antona

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specific reaction toward a given drug varies a lot between individuals and, for many drugs, pharmacogenetic polymorphisms are known to affect biotransformation and clinical outcome. Estimation of the individual's drug-metabolizing capacity can be undertaken by genotyping drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in the respective drug metabolism. Consequences that arise from genotyping may be the adjustment of dose according to genotype, choice of therapeutic strategy, or even choice of drug. One of the first fields where the clinical application of pharmacogenetics may be used is in that of antipsychotic and antidepressant drug treatment because there is a special need for individualized therapy in psychiatry. The pharmacokinetics of many TCAs, some SSRIs and other antidepressant drugs is significantly altered by polymorphisms; however, some controversy still exists as to whether therapeutic efficacy may be improved and/or adverse events can be prevented by genetically driven adjustment of drug dosage. Pharmacogenetic diagnostics may be an important factor in individualizing drug treatment according to the genetic make-up of the patients. However, routine application of pharmacogenetic dose adjustment in clinical practice requires prospective validation.

Indexed as

AdultAntipsychotic AgentsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6GenotypeHumansMental DisordersPharmacogeneticsPolymorphism, GeneticPropylaminesPsychotropic DrugsTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6PropylaminesPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.