Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19318671›Full record

SynthesisChest2009

Systematic review and metaanalysis: urinary antigen tests for Legionellosis.

Toshihiko Shimada, Yoshinori Noguchi, Jeffrey L Jackson, Jun Miyashita, Yasuaki Hayashino, Toru Kamiya, Shin Yamazaki, Tadashi Matsumura, Shunichi Fukuhara

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chest, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global Perspective ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Legionnaires' disease following lake swimming in Iowa.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CRP under 130 mg/L rules out the diagnosis of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (URINELLA Study).European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Identification rate ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Severe Legionnaires' disease.Annals of intensive care · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Acute management of pneumonia in adult patients.Singapore medical journal · 2023
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Toshihiko ShimadaDepartment of Epidemiology and Healthcare Research, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Department of General Internal Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: smdtshk@gmail.com.
Yoshinori NoguchiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Jeffrey L JacksonUniformed Services University, Bethesda MD.
Jun MiyashitaDepartment of Epidemiology and Healthcare Research, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Department of General Internal Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuaki HayashinoDepartment of Epidemiology and Healthcare Research, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Toru KamiyaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Shin YamazakiDepartment of Epidemiology and Healthcare Research, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tadashi MatsumuraDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Shunichi FukuharaDepartment of Epidemiology and Healthcare Research, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPRakuwakai Otowa Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital · JPUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary antigen assays offer simplicity and rapidity in diagnosing Legionnaires' disease, though studies report a range of sensitivities. We conducted a systematic review to assess the test characteristics of Legionella urinary antigen.

methodsWe searched Medline, Excerpta Medica Database, and bibliographies of retrieved articles. English-language studies were used and included if the absolute number of true-positive, false-negative, true-negative, and false-positive observations were available, and the "gold standards" were described clearly. Two investigators independently reviewed articles and extracted data. Quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS). Sensitivities and specificities were pooled using a random-effects model weighted with the inverse of the SE calculated through the Wald method.

resultsFifty articles were retrieved for detailed evaluation, and 30 met the inclusion criteria. All but two studies focused on serotype 1 Legionella. Forty assays were reported using six different methodologies, whereas 26 assays used commercial tests, and 14 assays used in-house tests. Study quality was generally low, with average QUADAS scores of 4.4 of a total of 14 points (range, 1 to 9 points). The pooled sensitivity was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.81), and the specificity was 0.991 (95% CI, 0.984 to 0.997). Higher quality studies had lower sensitivity, and there was evidence of publication bias.

conclusionsLegionella urinary antigen for serotype 1 appears to have excellent specificity, though modest sensitivity. However, the poor quality of the included studies and the presence of publication bias suggest an overestimation of test performance. High-quality studies are needed.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialHumansLegionellaLegionellosisSensitivity and SpecificityUrinalysisAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID19318671
OpenAlexW2153622858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.