Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19317915›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2009

Natural genetic variation in transcriptome reflects network structure inferred with major effect mutations: insulin/TOR and associated phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Sergey V Nuzhdin, Jennifer A Brisson, Andrew Pickering, Marta L Wayne, Lawrence G Harshman, Lauren M McIntyre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Relating quantitative variation within a behavior to variation in transcription.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic basis of aging and life-history evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genotype-phenotype mapping in a post-GWAS world.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2012
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergey V NuzhdinMolecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. snuzhdin@usc.edu
Jennifer A Brisson
Andrew Pickering
Marta L Wayne
Lawrence G Harshman
Lauren M McIntyre

Funding

Genetic variation of allele-specific transcriptome in DrosophilaR01GM077618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCINTYRE, LAUREN M. · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
Quantitative genomics of sexual dimorphismR24GM065513 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2002 to 2005
$1.5M
Nucleotide polymorphisms responsible for expression variation in DrosophilaR01GM076643 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2006 to 2009
$1.2M
Contrasting environmental and genetic controls of alternative phenotypesK99ES017367 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BRISSON, JENNIFER A · 2008 to 2008
$90k
NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES017367NIEHS NIH HHS K99ES017367NIGMS NIH HHS 1R24GM065513NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM077618NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076643NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077618NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM065513PHS HHS RGM076643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA molecular process based genotype-to-phenotype map will ultimately enable us to predict how genetic variation among individuals results in phenotypic alterations. Building such a map is, however, far from straightforward. It requires understanding how molecular variation re-shapes developmental and metabolic networks, and how the functional state of these networks modifies phenotypes in genotype specific way. We focus on the latter problem by describing genetic variation in transcript levels of genes in the InR/TOR pathway among 72 Drosophila melanogaster genotypes.

resultsWe observe tight co-variance in transcript levels of genes not known to influence each other through direct transcriptional control. We summarize transcriptome variation with factor analyses, and observe strong co-variance of gene expression within the dFOXO-branch and within the TOR-branch of the pathway. Finally, we investigate whether major axes of transcriptome variation shape phenotypes expected to be influenced through the InR/TOR pathway. We find limited evidence that transcript levels of individual upstream genes in the InR/TOR pathway predict fly phenotypes in expected ways. However, there is no evidence that these effects are mediated through the major axes of downstream transcriptome variation.

conclusionIn summary, our results question the assertion of the 'sparse' nature of genetic networks, while validating and extending candidate gene approaches in the analyses of complex traits.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, InsectGenetic VariationGenome, InsectInsulinMaleMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeDrosophila ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXO protein, DrosophilaInsulinReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinasestor protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID19317915
PMCPMC2674066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.