Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19317490›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2009

Tuning transport properties of nanofluidic devices with local charge inversion.

Yan He, Dirk Gillespie, Dezsö Boda, Ivan Vlassiouk, Robert S Eisenberg, Zuzanna S Siwy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Setting Boundaries for Statistical Mechanics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Rectification of Ion Current in Nanopores Depends on the Type of Monovalent Cations: Experiments and Modeling.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan HeDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Dirk Gillespie
Dezsö Boda
Ivan Vlassiouk
Robert S Eisenberg
Zuzanna S Siwy

Funding

Simulations of Calcium Selectivity and BindingR01GM076013 · NIGMS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI EISENBERG, ROBERT S. · 2006 to 2009
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076013NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotubes can selectively conduct ions across membranes to make ionic devices with transport characteristics similar to biological ion channels and semiconductor electron devices. Depending on the surface charge profile of the nanopore, ohmic resistors, rectifiers, and diodes can be made. Here we show that a uniformly charged conical nanopore can have all these transport properties by changing the ion species and their concentrations on each side of the membrane. Moreover, the cation versus anion selectivity of the pores can be changed. We find that polyvalent cations like Ca(2+) and the trivalent cobalt sepulchrate produce localized charge inversion to change the effective pore surface charge profile from negative to positive. These effects are reversible so that the transport and selectivity characteristics of ionic devices can be tuned, much as the gate voltage tunes the properties of a semiconductor.

Indexed as

CalciumElectric ConductivityElectrochemistryElectrolytesIonsModels, ChemicalMonte Carlo MethodNanotechnologyNanotubesPolyethylene TerephthalatesCalciumElectrolytesIonsPolyethylene Terephthalates

Identifiers

PMID19317490
PMCPMC2714767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.