Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19317443›Full record

ReviewAccounts of chemical research2009

Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization.

William L Jorgensen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 261 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
261citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

261 citing papers in PubMed, 651 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Computational Strategies Reshaping Modern Drug Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Computational Pipeline for Accelerating the Design of Glycomimetics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

201 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

William L JorgensenDepartment of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS FOR WATER PROTEIN INTERACTIONSR01GM032136 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JORGENSEN, WILLIAM L. · 1985 to 2023
$8.2M
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF ANTIHIV DRUGSR01AI044616 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JORGENSEN, WILLIAM L. · 1999 to 2022
$7.7M
NIAID NIH HHS AI44616NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044616NIGMS NIH HHS GM32136NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the 1980s, advances in the abilities to perform computer simulations of chemical and biomolecular systems and to calculate free energy changes led to the expectation that such methodology would soon show great utility for guiding molecular design. Important potential applications included design of selective receptors, catalysts, and regulators of biological function including enzyme inhibitors. This time also saw the rise of high-throughput screening and combinatorial chemistry along with complementary computational methods for de novo design and virtual screening including docking. These technologies appeared poised to deliver diverse lead compounds for any biological target. As with many technological advances, realization of the expectations required significant additional effort and time. However, as summarized here, striking success has now been achieved for computer-aided drug lead generation and optimization. De novo design using both molecular growing and docking are illustrated for lead generation, and lead optimization features free energy perturbation calculations in conjunction with Monte Carlo statistical mechanics simulations for protein-inhibitor complexes in aqueous solution. The specific applications are to the discovery of non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptase (HIV-RT) and inhibitors of the binding of the proinflammatory cytokine MIF to its receptor CD74. A standard protocol is presented that includes scans for possible additions of small substituents to a molecular core, interchange of heterocycles, and focused optimization of substituents at one site. Initial leads with activities at low-micromolar concentrations have been advanced rapidly to low-nanomolar inhibitors.

Indexed as

Antigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteBinding SitesCombinatorial Chemistry TechniquesComputer-Aided DesignComputer SimulationDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHIV Reverse TranscriptaseMonte Carlo MethodProtein BindingReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsStructure-Activity RelationshipThermodynamicsAntigens, Differentiation, B-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHIV Reverse Transcriptaseinvariant chainReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID19317443
PMCPMC2727934
OpenAlexW2025006523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.